p********6
发帖数: 14 | 1 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major
significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感
谢 |
j****e
发帖数: 826 | 2 先研究大蜜俱乐部的文章啊
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】
: 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major
: significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感
: 谢
|
W***o
发帖数: 6519 | 3 怎么证明major啊？
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】
: 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major
: significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感
: 谢
|
a**l
发帖数: 219 | 4 baackground什么都没有，叫大家怎么出主意...
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】
: 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major
: significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感
: 谢
|
p********6
发帖数: 14 | 5 不好意思,着急忘说了
7 paper
80 citation
14 reviewer
很弱! :(
In the RFE letter the officer stated:
1 the evidence falls short in establishing your works is considered a major
significant contribution.
2 Your citation record does not establish your work has made a major
significant impact with your field. It has not been established your works
has been heavily cited or widely implemented.
请指教! |
h**********e
发帖数: 4328 | 6 这是a还是b啊
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思,着急忘说了
: 7 paper
: 80 citation
: 14 reviewer
: 很弱! :(
: In the RFE letter the officer stated:
: 1 the evidence falls short in establishing your works is considered a major
: significant contribution.
: 2 Your citation record does not establish your work has made a major
: significant impact with your field. It has not been established your works
|
p********6
发帖数: 14 | |
P*******1
发帖数: 704 | 8 看起来是比平均少了点。是不是太急了点？
我从NIW到Eb1a等了快三年了。就是因为引用和review文章太少了。
你现在估计也只能硬着头皮，发掘一下看有没有更多亮点了。
Good luck!
major
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思,着急忘说了
: 7 paper
: 80 citation
: 14 reviewer
: 很弱! :(
: In the RFE letter the officer stated:
: 1 the evidence falls short in establishing your works is considered a major
: significant contribution.
: 2 Your citation record does not establish your work has made a major
: significant impact with your field. It has not been established your works
|
