s****y
发帖数: 401 | 1 看起来跟理工科博士毕业、搞科研有关系的有五条：
1. Published materials about the alien, in any language, provided it has
been translated into English, in professional or major trade publications or
major newspaper about the alien;
2. Evidence of the alien’s original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field;
3. Evidence of the alien’s participation, either individually or on a panel
, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of
specialization for which classification is sought;
4. Evidence of the alien’s authorship of scholarly articles in the field,
in professional or major trade publications or other major media;
5. Evidence that the alien has performed in a leading or critical role for
organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation;
我理解第2，3，4条就是版上所说的老三样，对吧？
第2条original contributions的支持材料有：同行推荐信，被引用亮点，邀请报告等。
第3条a judge of the work of others的支持材料有：杂志编辑推荐信。
第4条authorship of scholarly articles的支持材料有：自己发表的文章。
关于第1条Published materials about the alien，看到有的petition letter模版用
被引用亮点来支持第1条，说明自己被别人文章提到。这是不是不够充分？而且和第2条
内容重复。我理解是要被新闻媒体，例如电视、网络、杂志等报道了才行。
关于第5条a leading or critical role，某些模板用在博士后老板的科研组里perform
critical role来支持，是不是不够充分？
如果同时claim五条，似乎中的机会多些，但阐述重点就不够突出了，跟只claim老三样
比，哪个好些？ | C*******x
发帖数: 132 | 2 我个人的理解哈，不要样样都说，却又不说透，这样的效果还不上claim老三样，还容
易惹来REF，但具体情况还是要具体分析，坐等高人出现解答 |
|
