d*******3
发帖数: 148 | 1 ****************************************************************************
Timeline:
Nov.23 PP Started
Nov.28 RFE
承认了authorship和review, 质疑contribution:
关键话语是：
"... This evidence is not sufficient because while the authors of his
letters of reference describe his work in detail and describe the petitioner
as a very talented scientist, they do not describe a contribution of major
significance.”
很明显是推荐信的问题...
有人了解这个0299吗? 考古了半天, 竟然几乎没有找到有用信息, 特别是最近两年的.
不过还是庆幸没遇到0214这个公认的杀手... 自我安慰一下了... |
c*****k
发帖数: 112 | |
t******1
发帖数: 317 | |
c*****k
发帖数: 112 | 4 这个rfe不难对付 既然知道谁推荐信的问题 就好了
**
petitioner
major
【在 d*******3 的大作中提到】
: ****************************************************************************
: Timeline:
: Nov.23 PP Started
: Nov.28 RFE
: 承认了authorship和review, 质疑contribution:
: 关键话语是：
: "... This evidence is not sufficient because while the authors of his
: letters of reference describe his work in detail and describe the petitioner
: as a very talented scientist, they do not describe a contribution of major
: significance.”
|
z*******g
发帖数: 5721 | |
c********0
发帖数: 669 | |
y*****o
发帖数: 2364 | |
d*******3
发帖数: 148 | |
d*******3
发帖数: 148 | 9 Approved~~
Really happy~
Fight for 485! |
l******y
发帖数: 2643 | |
|
|
u****r
发帖数: 2053 | |
e**********6
发帖数: 46 | |
d*******3
发帖数: 148 | 13
Only revised and reorganized my PL. I took the risk without submitting new
RL.
【在 e**********6 的大作中提到】
: con!请问楼主后来提交了什么？
|
w*********w
发帖数: 959 | |
m*****a
发帖数: 636 | |
C***3
发帖数: 1719 | |
s********c
发帖数: 2313 | |
o****g
发帖数: 1873 | |
s*****n
发帖数: 399 | |
z*******g
发帖数: 5721 | |
t*********r
发帖数: 4143 | |
