n******a
发帖数: 2 | 1 臭名昭著的移民法第202条，即美国法典第8卷1152条：
8 U.S. Code § 1152. Numerical limitations on individual foreign
states
(a) Per country level
(1) Nondiscrimination
(A) Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 1101(a)
(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any
preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an
immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of
birth, or place of residence.
(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the authority of
the Secretary of State to determine the procedures for the processing of
immigrant visa applications or the locations where such applications will be
processed.
(2) Per country levels for family-sponsored and employment-based immigrants
Subject to paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), the total number of immigrant visas
made available to natives of any single foreign state or dependent area
under subsections (a) and (b) of section 1153 of this title in any fiscal
year may not exceed 7 percent (in the case of a single foreign state) or 2
percent (in the case of a dependent area) of the total number of such visas
made available under such subsections in that fiscal year.
(3) Exception if additional visas available
If because of the application of paragraph (2) with respect to one or more
foreign states or dependent areas, the total number of visas available under
both subsections (a) and (b) of section 1153 of this title for a calendar
quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who otherwise may be
issued such a visa, paragraph (2) shall not apply to visas made available to
such states or areas during the remainder of such calendar quarter.
(4) Special rules for spouses and children of lawful permanent resident
aliens 这一条是讲LPR的配偶和子女的，所以就不粘贴全文了
(5) Rules for employment-based immigrants
(A) Employment-based immigrants not subject to per country limitation if
additional visas available
If the total number of visas available under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4),
or (5) of section 1153(b) of this title for a calendar quarter exceeds the
number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be issued such visas, the
visas made available under that paragraph shall be issued without regard to
the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of this subsection during the
remainder of the calendar quarter.
法律引用的一些其他条款，不再原文引用。大意如下：
* 1101(a)是移民法一开始对于各种词汇的定义。其中(27)是定义“special immigrant
”的。比如放弃国籍回来的、美国海外机构工作15年的之类的。基本跟我们没关系。
* 1151是Worldwide level of immigration，讲总名额。(a)是综述，(b)是无配额类别
（比如美国公民父母），(c)是FB总名额，(d)是EB总名额。
* 1153是Allocation of immigrant visas，讲FB和EB各自是怎么分配的，其中1153(a)
就是FB1234，1153(b)就是EB12345等。
所以，结论就是：
8 USC 1152(a)(1)(A)规定了，除了特殊类别、无配额类别，以及FB/EB内各级别的优先
级，所有人都一视同仁，不因种族、性别、国籍、出生地、居住地受到优待或受到歧视。
8 USC 1152(a)(2)就是臭名昭著的7%
8 USC 1152(a)(5)(A)，也就是《21世纪美国竞争力法案（AC21）》加入的，每季度
EB12345内用不掉的名额，不受1152(a)(2)的7%限制，可在该类别内不受限分配。
也就是说，在同一个类别内（比EB1），移民法的分配原则是：不许歧视，不许优待。
在EB1的SO分配上，是不允许给中国特殊照顾的，所有的SO都是先到先得。印度先到，
所以先得。只有印度的排期达到中国的排期，两国才可以同时有SO
等待中国拿SO的，不如早日放弃幻想，等印度人排期追上来再说...
PS. 如果有人拿EB23的超发来说事，超发不代表拿到SO。“超发”这个名字就表示了，
发超过了法定名额。奥本让你占了便宜而已，计算失误，不代表就该给你的。 | a****T
发帖数: 1 | | n******a
发帖数: 2 | 3 韩国eb超额的是fb来的，都在1152里有规定
这个不是超发，是他们本来就有名额 | a****T
发帖数: 1 | 4 哎，如果是这样的话，就变相等于拿中国eb1名额补贴印度eb2了
【在 n******a 的大作中提到】
: 韩国eb超额的是fb来的，都在1152里有规定
: 这个不是超发，是他们本来就有名额
| w*****t
发帖数: 10 | 5 排期日期是多少不还是uscis一句话的问题。中印的积累量的巨大差距已经存在多年，
之前就是为了让大家都吃SO所以排到一起去的吧，个人认为是没有SO才分开的
那么未来有了SO的话，恢复一起排然后都吃SO是合理的推测
a)
any
【在 n******a 的大作中提到】
: 臭名昭著的移民法第202条，即美国法典第8卷1152条：
: 8 U.S. Code § 1152. Numerical limitations on individual foreign
: states
: (a) Per country level
: (1) Nondiscrimination
: (A) Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 1101(a)
: (27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any
: preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an
: immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of
: birth, or place of residence.
|
|
