m*********9
发帖数: 1 | 1 移民官表示很不爽，没看到最终决定。
https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/uscis-response-to-preliminary-
injunction-of-fee-rule
WASHINGTON-U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Deputy Director of
Policy Joseph Edlow issued the following statement in response to the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California issuing a nationwide
preliminary injunction enjoining fee increases for citizenship and other
immigration benefits.
“This unfortunate decision leaves USCIS underfunded by millions of dollars
each business day the fee rule is enjoined. Unlike most government agencies
, USCIS is fee funded. As required by federal law, USCIS conducted a
comprehensive biennial fee review and determined that current fees do not
recover the cost of providing adjudication and naturalization services.
This is nothing new or abnormal. In fact, the fee rule is two years behind
schedule, and is a smaller percentage increase than the previous. In a fee-
funded agency such as USCIS, this increase is necessary to continue
operations in any long-term, meaningful way to ensure cost recovery. This
decision barring USCIS from enacting its mandatory fee increase is
unprecedented and harmful to the American people.”
For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or
follow us on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis),
Facebook (/uscis) and LinkedIn (/uscis).
======================================================================
美国华盛顿公民及移民服务政策副主任约瑟夫·爱德洛（Joseph Edlow）发表以下声明
，以回应美国加利福尼亚北区地方法院发布的全国性初步禁令，其中包括增加公民身份
和其他移民福利的收费。
“这个不幸的决定使美国移民局每个工作日的资金不足，导致收费规则受到限制。”与
大多数政府机构不同，移民局是收费的。根据联邦法律的要求，美国公民及移民服务局
（USCIS）进行了全面的两年期费用审查，并确定当前费用不能收回提供裁决和归化服
务的成本。这不是什么新鲜事或异常。实际上，费用规则比计划晚了两年，并且比以前
增加了一个较小的百分比。在诸如USCIS这样由费用资助的机构中，这种增加对于以任
何长期，有意义的方式继续运营以确保成本回收是必要的。这项禁止移民局实施强制性
加费的决定是前所未有的，对美国人民有害。”
有关USCIS及其计划的更多信息，请访问uscis.gov或在Twitter（@uscis），Instagram
（/ uscis），YouTube（/ uscis），Facebook（/ uscis）和LinkedIn（/ uscis）上
关注我们。 |
|
