b****e 发帖数: 460 | 1 And Charlie is more knowledgeable and better at expression ideas, though
sometimes Warren may intentionally hide harsh statement under a sugar coat. | h*******y 发帖数: 864 | 2 Charlie is arguably a better investor than Warren. For a lot of mistakes
that Warren made, Charlie was against the purchase.
On the other hand, Warren does provide a lot better entertainment than
Charlie. He likes to make jokes and pass out his wisdom in memorable quotes.
Overall, I think Warren is a better businessman but Charlies is a better
investor.
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : And Charlie is more knowledgeable and better at expression ideas, though : sometimes Warren may intentionally hide harsh statement under a sugar coat.
| b****e 发帖数: 460 | 3 Right, Charlie is a better mentor with a style seems harsh to someone.
However, about investment, it's hard to say. Charlie is more of a
conservative one. And Charlie has more of Fisher than Warren does. Charlie
has more guts than Warren on resisting impulsive things though they both
have strong guts. We can see these from their styles of early days when they
manage funds separately. Warren has more work-out skills demonstrated in
Washington Post case and Sanborn Map case, but these skills can b
【在 h*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Charlie is arguably a better investor than Warren. For a lot of mistakes : that Warren made, Charlie was against the purchase. : On the other hand, Warren does provide a lot better entertainment than : Charlie. He likes to make jokes and pass out his wisdom in memorable quotes. : Overall, I think Warren is a better businessman but Charlies is a better : investor.
| h*******y 发帖数: 864 | 4 Charlie had one great quote from the annual meeting: Sometimes I feel my
sole function is to show shareholders that they'll get another good seven
years out of Warren. LOL.
they
is
insurance
masterpiece.
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Right, Charlie is a better mentor with a style seems harsh to someone. : However, about investment, it's hard to say. Charlie is more of a : conservative one. And Charlie has more of Fisher than Warren does. Charlie : has more guts than Warren on resisting impulsive things though they both : have strong guts. We can see these from their styles of early days when they : manage funds separately. Warren has more work-out skills demonstrated in : Washington Post case and Sanborn Map case, but these skills can b
| b****e 发帖数: 460 | 5 That's true, that's what I feel. And, I think Warren was no longer worry
about that question couple of years ago when he gave Bill Gates majority of
his shares. In a sense, Bill is forced to take care of Berkshire if
something unexpected will happen. What we call it in Bridge? Strip squeeze?
【在 h*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Charlie had one great quote from the annual meeting: Sometimes I feel my : sole function is to show shareholders that they'll get another good seven : years out of Warren. LOL. : : they : is : insurance : masterpiece.
| h*******y 发帖数: 864 | 6 I actually don't think that will work. Berkshire is in acquisition business.
..it competes with others (e.g. private equity firms) to gain access to
sound business. Over the years, these businesses are willing to sell it to
Berkshire for a smaller price because they like Warren's reputation of
keeping his hand off managing their businesses (except the capital
allocation part). I don't think Bill Gates has that reputation...and he will
need to pay a price for it.
of
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : That's true, that's what I feel. And, I think Warren was no longer worry : about that question couple of years ago when he gave Bill Gates majority of : his shares. In a sense, Bill is forced to take care of Berkshire if : something unexpected will happen. What we call it in Bridge? Strip squeeze?
| b****e 发帖数: 460 | 7 I still think Bill Gates is the best candidate.
1) He is someone doesn't need money, he will take the responsisbility for th
e company.
2) He is a successful business man.
3) He has shown his ability managing huge fund.
4) He has some authority that no other man can compare.
5) He can deligate things successfully.
Well, true, Bill doesn't have the reputation of acquiring a business and let
it keep running alone. But, I don't think anyone else does. Bill won't end
up running the company himself,
【在 h*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I actually don't think that will work. Berkshire is in acquisition business. : ..it competes with others (e.g. private equity firms) to gain access to : sound business. Over the years, these businesses are willing to sell it to : Berkshire for a smaller price because they like Warren's reputation of : keeping his hand off managing their businesses (except the capital : allocation part). I don't think Bill Gates has that reputation...and he will : need to pay a price for it. : : of
| h****r 发帖数: 2056 | 8 跟livermore一比,这两就啥都不是了。
they
is
insurance
masterpiece.
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Right, Charlie is a better mentor with a style seems harsh to someone. : However, about investment, it's hard to say. Charlie is more of a : conservative one. And Charlie has more of Fisher than Warren does. Charlie : has more guts than Warren on resisting impulsive things though they both : have strong guts. We can see these from their styles of early days when they : manage funds separately. Warren has more work-out skills demonstrated in : Washington Post case and Sanborn Map case, but these skills can b
|
|