D**********d
发帖数: 849 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 pennystock 俱乐部 】
发信人: DreamingBird (DreamingBird), 信区: pennystock
标 题: 求建议：第一次投资
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jan 5 20:35:26 2011, 美东)
Goal: Expected return above 3% in the next 1-2 years after broker fee, tax
and inflation adjusted. Small risk.
1. Do not want to trade too frequently. Turnover less than 20% per year
2. I prefer index ETF(Large size) over individual stocks, because 1.
commission fee. 2. Not so much time in analyzing stock by stock. 3. less
risk. 4. liquidity
3. For the umemployment rate, I guess the us economic will be better.
4. The investment will not exceed $5000 and use little leverage
As a conclusion, I will bet on:
ProShares Ultra S&P500 (NYSEArca: SSO ) 49.41
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (NYSEArca: DDM ) 55.78
Welcome to comments! Thanks. | s********n
发帖数: 1962 | 2 My comment is that if you want to hold index for long-term, don't
use Ultra ETF, buy ordinary ETF on margin instead.
Ultra ETF is not for long-term holding. They are bad designed products
only good for day-traders.
【在 D**********d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 pennystock 俱乐部 】
: 发信人: DreamingBird (DreamingBird), 信区: pennystock
: 标 题: 求建议：第一次投资
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jan 5 20:35:26 2011, 美东)
: Goal: Expected return above 3% in the next 1-2 years after broker fee, tax
: and inflation adjusted. Small risk.
: 1. Do not want to trade too frequently. Turnover less than 20% per year
: 2. I prefer index ETF(Large size) over individual stocks, because 1.
: commission fee. 2. Not so much time in analyzing stock by stock. 3. less
: risk. 4. liquidity
| w***w
发帖数: 6301 | 3 He wants small risk and guess the us economic will be better.
Then why he bet on ProShares Ultra, which is a high leverage short? |
|
