f****y
发帖数: 921 | 1 有个问题想跟大家讨教一下：都知道fidelity的expense ratio要比vanguard高一些。
我比较了一些两家相似的fund，价格浮动百分比类似，fidelity的dividend还略高。在
这种情况下，是不是说明fidelity这个fund的原始盈利更高一些，这样才可以保证在
cover高expense的基础上还能给投资者与vanguand类似的盈利？ |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 2 Mutual funds do not have dividends. What you saw is distribution.
The bigger the worse.
Your conclusion is correct though. But this is most likely because
Fidelity funds have slightly higher volatility.
【在 f****y 的大作中提到】
: 有个问题想跟大家讨教一下：都知道fidelity的expense ratio要比vanguard高一些。
: 我比较了一些两家相似的fund，价格浮动百分比类似，fidelity的dividend还略高。在
: 这种情况下，是不是说明fidelity这个fund的原始盈利更高一些，这样才可以保证在
: cover高expense的基础上还能给投资者与vanguand类似的盈利？
|
f****y
发帖数: 921 | 3 I copied FCTFX from their webpage:
distribution History
Dividends (Distributed Monthly)
Date Per Share Amount Reinvestment Price
04/30/2011 $0.041892916 $11.71
05/31/2011 $0.043348789 $11.87
06/30/2011 $0.041419874 $11.89
07/31/2011 $0.042852617 $11.98
这distribution和dividend不是一回事嘛
另外，为什么The bigger the worse。这不就类似银行利息，难道不是多多益善吗？
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Mutual funds do not have dividends. What you saw is distribution.
: The bigger the worse.
: Your conclusion is correct though. But this is most likely because
: Fidelity funds have slightly higher volatility.
|
D******y
发帖数: 3780 | 4 because of the tax
【在 f****y 的大作中提到】
: I copied FCTFX from their webpage:
: distribution History
: Dividends (Distributed Monthly)
: Date Per Share Amount Reinvestment Price
: 04/30/2011 $0.041892916 $11.71
: 05/31/2011 $0.043348789 $11.87
: 06/30/2011 $0.041419874 $11.89
: 07/31/2011 $0.042852617 $11.98
: 这distribution和dividend不是一回事嘛
: 另外，为什么The bigger the worse。这不就类似银行利息，难道不是多多益善吗？
|
