j*****h
发帖数: 3292 | |
s****i
发帖数: 2993 | 2 unlimited between spouses. |
j*****h
发帖数: 3292 | 3
nod, nod, just as love is unlimited.
let me reframe my Q" what is the maximum amount with tax advantage?
【在 s****i 的大作中提到】
: unlimited between spouses.
|
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 4 for married couple, yours is mine and mine is yours. no such thing as gift.
married couple can gift a third person without tax consequence $26k/year.
【在 j*****h 的大作中提到】
:
: nod, nod, just as love is unlimited.
: let me reframe my Q" what is the maximum amount with tax advantage?
|
m****m
发帖数: 2211 | 5 without tax consequence是什么意思？
gift.
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: for married couple, yours is mine and mine is yours. no such thing as gift.
: married couple can gift a third person without tax consequence $26k/year.
|
j*****h
发帖数: 3292 | 6 尼玛，又坑爹了，看的是中文的<投资艺术>，译错了?
google 了原文
investing> By Charles D. Ellis page 160
“you can give up to $10,000 -without tax- to each person you wish every
year. Married couples can give $20,000 annually to each person........" |
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 7 说的没错啊，除了number outdated了。现在应该是$13000/$26000.
【在 j*****h 的大作中提到】
: 尼玛，又坑爹了，看的是中文的<投资艺术>，译错了?
: google 了原文 : investing> By Charles D. Ellis page 160
: “you can give up to $10,000 -without tax- to each person you wish every
: year. Married couples can give $20,000 annually to each person........"
|
j*****h
发帖数: 3292 | 8 中文译本可能把to each person, 看成了to each other 了
faint
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: 说的没错啊，除了number outdated了。现在应该是$13000/$26000.
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 9
超过13000也不用交税，税表上说明一下就可以了
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: 说的没错啊，除了number outdated了。现在应该是$13000/$26000.
|
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 10 this is one of the consequences.
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
:
: 超过13000也不用交税，税表上说明一下就可以了
|
