b******y
发帖数: 9224 | 1 等着让java更快，呵呵，估计不现实吧。
cheaper/faster/better, you can just get 2 out of the 3. Java is better,
development wise is cheaper, but not faster... |
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 2 I think hotspot in server VM makes it pretty close.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: 等着让java更快，呵呵，估计不现实吧。
: cheaper/faster/better, you can just get 2 out of the 3. Java is better,
: development wise is cheaper, but not faster...
|
k***r
发帖数: 4260 | 3 Java 好像也不是异常地慢，但是占内存实在没有道理地大。 |
d***q
发帖数: 1119 | 4 看 benchmark 比mono还要吃内存
很奇怪 |
k***r
发帖数: 4260 | 5 用什么工具看的呀？
【在 d***q 的大作中提到】
: 看 benchmark 比mono还要吃内存
: 很奇怪
|
b******y
发帖数: 9224 | |
b**g
发帖数: 335 | 7 gcj?
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: 等着让java更快，呵呵，估计不现实吧。
: cheaper/faster/better, you can just get 2 out of the 3. Java is better,
: development wise is cheaper, but not faster...
|
k***r
发帖数: 4260 | |
t*******e
发帖数: 684 | 9 JVMs with JIT compiler generate some native code at runtime to replace a
portion of byte code interpretations. |
x******h
发帖数: 13678 | |
m******t
发帖数: 2416 | 11
The thing with jit is it by design only optimizes code
that it has seen executed repeatedly. So jit means a lot
for server apps, but isn't really that big of a helper
on desktops.
【在 x******h 的大作中提到】
: JIT能明显提高效率
|
x******h
发帖数: 13678 | 12 受教了
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: The thing with jit is it by design only optimizes code
: that it has seen executed repeatedly. So jit means a lot
: for server apps, but isn't really that big of a helper
: on desktops.
|
