s***1
发帖数: 49 | 1 我平时用java都是学校里Unix上用，从来不关心版本问题。 所以就信口答来是 1.6.
后来他说是 java 6, 加上了generic programming. 我回来一看果然是6，而且对
generic programming不怎么了解. 这个是严重问题吗？ 他问我的java技术问题我都答
对的。。。。 |
k***r
发帖数: 4260 | 2 1.6和6有啥不同
I personally don't think generics is a big deal. More syntactic
sugar to me. |
A**o
发帖数: 1550 | 3 it's just a question too see how familiar you are with the latest java trend.
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: 我平时用java都是学校里Unix上用，从来不关心版本问题。 所以就信口答来是 1.6.
: 后来他说是 java 6, 加上了generic programming. 我回来一看果然是6，而且对
: generic programming不怎么了解. 这个是严重问题吗？ 他问我的java技术问题我都答
: 对的。。。。
|
s***1
发帖数: 49 | 4 What if I am unfamiliar with the latest trend. But still answered all his
java knowledge questions correctly (all the questions he asked were
traditional questions, not latest ones). |
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 5 1.6 is still correct, it's Sun itself that made this versioning mess. The
official version is 6, but it still uses 1.6 internally
generics emgerged since Java 5, it's somewhat similar to C++ template.
shouldn't be a big problem because it's really not a rocket science. but it'
s good to know about it.
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: 我平时用java都是学校里Unix上用，从来不关心版本问题。 所以就信口答来是 1.6.
: 后来他说是 java 6, 加上了generic programming. 我回来一看果然是6，而且对
: generic programming不怎么了解. 这个是严重问题吗？ 他问我的java技术问题我都答
: 对的。。。。
|
A**o
发帖数: 1550 | 6 it's up to what they want from you.
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: What if I am unfamiliar with the latest trend. But still answered all his
: java knowledge questions correctly (all the questions he asked were
: traditional questions, not latest ones).
|
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 7 I think most recent major language updates are generics and annotation, just
make sure you understand what they are, and how generics work in collection
framework etc
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: What if I am unfamiliar with the latest trend. But still answered all his
: java knowledge questions correctly (all the questions he asked were
: traditional questions, not latest ones).
|
s***1
发帖数: 49 | 8 really 1.6 is correct?
it'
【在 Z****e 的大作中提到】
: 1.6 is still correct, it's Sun itself that made this versioning mess. The
: official version is 6, but it still uses 1.6 internally
: generics emgerged since Java 5, it's somewhat similar to C++ template.
: shouldn't be a big problem because it's really not a rocket science. but it'
: s good to know about it.
|
Z****e
发帖数: 2999 | 9 yeah, type "java -version", you'll see
1.6 is internal version, or say, geek versioning, for example, XP is really
5.1, vista is really 6.0
Java SE 6 is the production version
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: really 1.6 is correct?
:
: it'
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 10 1.6 is java internal version, 6 is official version.
【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 1.6和6有啥不同
: I personally don't think generics is a big deal. More syntactic
: sugar to me.
|
|
|
k***r
发帖数: 4260 | 11 Yeah. I suppose the interviewer should have known that
they are the same.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: 1.6 is java internal version, 6 is official version.
|
b******y
发帖数: 9224 | 12 they just want to check how intimate you are with java ;-) |
r*****l
发帖数: 2859 | 13 6和1.6是一样的。如果这个interviewer这么小的地方都抠，哪
我看以后和他工作没有什么好果子。
而且generic是1.5就开始有了。
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: 我平时用java都是学校里Unix上用，从来不关心版本问题。 所以就信口答来是 1.6.
: 后来他说是 java 6, 加上了generic programming. 我回来一看果然是6，而且对
: generic programming不怎么了解. 这个是严重问题吗？ 他问我的java技术问题我都答
: 对的。。。。
|
A**o
发帖数: 1550 | 14 maybe the statement is a trap waiting for the interviewee
to fight back and claim they are the same. i might do that.
【在 r*****l 的大作中提到】
: 6和1.6是一样的。如果这个interviewer这么小的地方都抠，哪
: 我看以后和他工作没有什么好果子。
: 而且generic是1.5就开始有了。
|
b******y
发帖数: 1684 | 15 u bad guy... veli veli bad...
【在 A**o 的大作中提到】
: maybe the statement is a trap waiting for the interviewee
: to fight back and claim they are the same. i might do that.
|
r*****l
发帖数: 2859 | 16 Interviewer应该大气，本来interviewee在心理和气势上就占下风。
用这种方法不能测出interviewee的真实水平。
要用阳谋，不是阴谋。
【在 A**o 的大作中提到】
: maybe the statement is a trap waiting for the interviewee
: to fight back and claim they are the same. i might do that.
|
g**********y
发帖数: 14569 | 17 Interview问这问题，真是谋财害命：回答上来的人，可能一行code都没写过；回答不
上来的人，你也不能disqualify他。还不如：你的咖啡加几块糖？至少还显得实诚。 |
o**1
发帖数: 6383 | 18 真正关注java最新发展的，经常看技术文章的，都应该能回答出来这种问题。
【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】
: Interview问这问题，真是谋财害命：回答上来的人，可能一行code都没写过；回答不
: 上来的人，你也不能disqualify他。还不如：你的咖啡加几块糖？至少还显得实诚。
|
r*****l
发帖数: 2859 | 19 Do you really understand what LZ means?
1. He/She answered 1.6 and the interviewer said "should be java 6".
This is very trivial.
2. Generics is added since 1.5, not 1.6
【在 o**1 的大作中提到】
: 真正关注java最新发展的，经常看技术文章的，都应该能回答出来这种问题。
|
b***u
发帖数: 12010 | 20 generic是5加上去的⋯⋯
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: 我平时用java都是学校里Unix上用，从来不关心版本问题。 所以就信口答来是 1.6.
: 后来他说是 java 6, 加上了generic programming. 我回来一看果然是6，而且对
: generic programming不怎么了解. 这个是严重问题吗？ 他问我的java技术问题我都答
: 对的。。。。
|
|
|
m******t
发帖数: 2416 | 21
My understanding is that 1.6.0 is the implementation version Sun as a
JDK vendor assigned to specifically the Sun JDK implementation,
while 6 identifies the version of the platform standard, including language
spec, vm spec, core API, etc.
【在 s***1 的大作中提到】
: 我平时用java都是学校里Unix上用，从来不关心版本问题。 所以就信口答来是 1.6.
: 后来他说是 java 6, 加上了generic programming. 我回来一看果然是6，而且对
: generic programming不怎么了解. 这个是严重问题吗？ 他问我的java技术问题我都答
: 对的。。。。
|
B*****g
发帖数: 34098 | 22 What is the purpose to ask this question?
language
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: My understanding is that 1.6.0 is the implementation version Sun as a
: JDK vendor assigned to specifically the Sun JDK implementation,
: while 6 identifies the version of the platform standard, including language
: spec, vm spec, core API, etc.
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 23 I think IBM uses the same release version.
language
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: My understanding is that 1.6.0 is the implementation version Sun as a
: JDK vendor assigned to specifically the Sun JDK implementation,
: while 6 identifies the version of the platform standard, including language
: spec, vm spec, core API, etc.
|
m******t
发帖数: 2416 | 24
Yeah, I found a box with ibm jdk after the post. It does print something
to that effect. But then JRockit is currently at like 3.0.3. And OpenJDK
just goes with 6 or 7.
I guess like somebody said above, it's all messed up. ;-)
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: I think IBM uses the same release version.
:
: language
|
A**o
发帖数: 1550 | 25 JRockit is also recognized by my idea as 1.6.0_05
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Yeah, I found a box with ibm jdk after the post. It does print something
: to that effect. But then JRockit is currently at like 3.0.3. And OpenJDK
: just goes with 6 or 7.
: I guess like somebody said above, it's all messed up. ;-)
|
