q*******k
发帖数: 7 | 1 Recruiter 第一次联系我时就说明面试要承担面试费用。现在找到一个 On Site
Interview被要
求自己承担面试费用。虽然先前约定在先，但感觉公司这么招人不太厚道。请问大家什
么看法？谢先 |
n******r
发帖数: 1247 | 2 you don't want to work for such company
【在 q*******k 的大作中提到】
: Recruiter 第一次联系我时就说明面试要承担面试费用。现在找到一个 On Site
: Interview被要
: 求自己承担面试费用。虽然先前约定在先，但感觉公司这么招人不太厚道。请问大家什
: 么看法？谢先
|
c**2
发帖数: 8496 | 3 For a permanent job:
If you are applying for a sale/admin. assistant, intern, secretary or very
entry level of tech job, it's common they just hire locally and don't pay
for your travel and hotel. If this job is high tech (usually master's
degree required) or mid level or higher where nationwide hunt is common,
then this is not a good company you want to stay. When they are miser about
mere $1000 expense, how do you expect them to spend on projects or get
business.
But I guess in this case thi |
e****s
发帖数: 117 | 4 感觉不厚道
【在 q*******k 的大作中提到】
: Recruiter 第一次联系我时就说明面试要承担面试费用。现在找到一个 On Site
: Interview被要
: 求自己承担面试费用。虽然先前约定在先，但感觉公司这么招人不太厚道。请问大家什
: 么看法？谢先
|
c**********e
发帖数: 2007 | 5 Good point. It is fine if it is a contract position.
about
consulting
client,
【在 c**2 的大作中提到】
: For a permanent job:
: If you are applying for a sale/admin. assistant, intern, secretary or very
: entry level of tech job, it's common they just hire locally and don't pay
: for your travel and hotel. If this job is high tech (usually master's
: degree required) or mid level or higher where nationwide hunt is common,
: then this is not a good company you want to stay. When they are miser about
: mere $1000 expense, how do you expect them to spend on projects or get
: business.
: But I guess in this case thi
|
w****6
发帖数: 359 | 6 没什么不厚道，人家没有欺骗。如果你当初接受，现在又不舒服，是你自己的问题。 |
f****r
发帖数: 1140 | |
a**x
发帖数: 188 | 8 depends on your position
if the final salary won't be high, it's understandable the company doesn't
want to pay for interview |
f****r
发帖数: 1140 | 9 是不是contract job都这样子？
通过headhunter的话，interview expense 就跟原本招人的公司没有关系了，就看
headhunter愿意不愿意出面试费用了吧 |
