由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
JobHunting版 - 都来看看今年经济学诺贝尔奖的理论和找工作的关系
相关主题
Google电面题ms contractor sdet
请教一道behavioral的问题分享一个我在Glassdoor上给Uber的Review
G questionsSQL Database Developer Opening Central NJ
Goog questionsIBM 又犯病了
A Simple Question on Binary Search发文留念--TN的08第一挂
H1B question未来两三年里美国就业市场供不应求?
H1B processing is so so so so slow ...............Good job market or not...?
特大喜讯:我美憋大招了Twitter会不会有一天干掉Facebook? (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: mortensen话题: nobel话题: diamond话题: pissarides
进入JobHunting版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
M***s
发帖数: 96
1
关键字:all unemployment is voluntary。
似乎不是那么难懂嘛。
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nobel-for-explaining-why-markets-fail-2010-10-11
Nobel for explaining why markets fail
Commentary: Searching adds frictions and costs to the economy
===================
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Three economists — including one rejected by
the Senate as too inexperienced to work at the Federal Reserve — have won
the Nobel prize in economics for their work in explaining why markets
sometimes don’t work so well.
Trio Wins Nobel in Economics
Peter Diamond (center), Dale Mortensen (right) and Christopher Pissarides
win the 2010 Nobel economics prize for their work developing theories that
help explain how economic policies affect unemployment.
Specifically, Peter Diamond of MIT, Dale Mortensen of Northwestern
University and Christopher Pissarides of the London School of Economics were
honored for their insights into unemployment. It’s certainly a timely
topic. Read MarketWatch’s related article on the 2010 prize.
The problem with unemployment is that, theoretically, it shouldn’t exist.
Efficient market theory says unemployed workers should always be able to
find a job if they just lower their standards enough, just as all employers
should be able to find workers if they just lower theirs.
By this theory, all unemployment is voluntary.
Diamond, Mortensen and Pissarides reject that theory, arguing that it’s
costly to find just the right job — that is, one that matches your skills
and abilities and pays you what you are worth. From the employer’s point of
view, it’s just as costly: All the applicants look pretty much the same at
first; it’s not easy to tell beforehand if they can do the job, or whether
you can find someone who’ll do the job for less. Searching, in sum, is
costly.
The upshot of this research is that this searching — they called it “
friction” — can make markets inefficient. Taking the first job offered, or
hiring the first applicant would mean the economy wouldn’t work as well as
it could. We’d get Ph.D.’s driving cabs, and high-school dropouts running
nuclear plants.
Sometimes government policies can reduce the inefficiencies, but sometimes
they can make them worse. Providing unemployment benefits can keep workers
from accepting the wrong job out of desperation, but providing too many
benefits can lead to search times running even longer than necessary.
The research begun by Diamond, the one whose nomination to the Fed was left
languishing by the Senate, as well as Mortensen and Pissarides has been
extended into other markets and other economic conundrums, helping us to
understand how markets actually work, and how we can make them work better.
y*********u
发帖数: 1015
2
sounds cliche to me
1 (共1页)
进入JobHunting版参与讨论
相关主题
Twitter会不会有一天干掉Facebook? (转载)A Simple Question on Binary Search
我改了个印度名字投简历H1B question
好心劝人转码农结果被骂。H1B processing is so so so so slow ...............
Adatao这家公司怎么样?特大喜讯:我美憋大招了
Google电面题ms contractor sdet
请教一道behavioral的问题分享一个我在Glassdoor上给Uber的Review
G questionsSQL Database Developer Opening Central NJ
Goog questionsIBM 又犯病了
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: mortensen话题: nobel话题: diamond话题: pissarides