p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 1 Glassdoor, a jobs and career community where employees can anonymously rate
companies and CEOs, has just released its fourth annual Employees’ Choice
Awards, listing the top 50 “Best Places to Work,” based on surveys
collected from U.S. employees in 2011. The top five Best Places to Work,
according to employees, are: Bain & Company, McKinsey & Company, Facebook,
MITRE, and Google.
Looking at just the tech sector, the 2012 best places to work in technology
are Facebook, MITRE Google, Apple and Rackspace. Facebook actually slipped
from the top spot last year to number 3 on the 2012 list and Google had
moved up to the fifth slot from number 30 on last year’s list.
Other tech companies that made the list include Salesforce (13); SAP (22);
Intel (32); and Groupon (40).
Rackspace, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, NVIDIA, and Hewlett-Packard climbed
also saw big jumps up higher on the list. National Instruments CEO James
Truchard and NetApp’s Tom Georgens received 100% approval ratings this year
, followed by Apple’s Tim Cook (96%) and Synopsys’ Aart de Geus (96%).
Rounding out the top 5 is Intel’s Paul Otellini with a 93% approval rating
for the year.
eBay’s John Donahoe saw the biggest boost in approval ratings this year,
climbed to 65% approval from 30% last year. Sapient CEO Alan Herrick climbed
to 85% from 58%. Analog Devices’ CEO Jerry Fishman climbed to 80% from 55%
, and Intuit’s Brad Smith climbed to 84% from 60%.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg slipped to a 89% approval rating from 96%
approval last year.
Xerox CEO Ursula Burns fell to 28% approval, down from 65% approval last
year while Cisco Systems CEO John Chambers fell to 57% approval from 85% a
year ago. Netflix CEO Reed Hastings’ approval declined to 61% from 79% last
year and AOL CEO Tim Armstrong’s approval fell to 55% this year from 71% a
year ago.
In 2010, Leo Apotheker held 62% approval (and by the time he left office in
Sept. 2011 his cumulative rating was down to 57%), yet Meg Whitman now
stands at 76% approval. Yahoo’s Carol Bartz held a 56% approval in 2010 (
and 54% cumulative approval when she left office) yet current Yahoo CEO
Timothy Moore has just a 31% approval in his interim role. Larry Page has a
92% approval, but that falls short to Eric Schmidt’s 96% at the end of last
year. Apple’s Tim Cook has an impressive 96% approval, just one point
below Steve Jobs’ 97% approval when he officially turned over the reins
earlier this year. | v***n
发帖数: 5085 | 2 一个做webmail系统和内容管理系统的公司
听说邮件系统在市场上有60%的占有率
有一个美国同学在里面做 | p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 3
谢谢。怎么热门的A，M，L,T,Z等都没有上榜呢？
【在 v***n 的大作中提到】
: 一个做webmail系统和内容管理系统的公司
: 听说邮件系统在市场上有60%的占有率
: 有一个美国同学在里面做
| P**********c
发帖数: 3417 | 4 Glassdoor's sample size is very small. Many companies in the list have just
20 something ratings within the year, and there are lots of companies that
don't qualify because of too few ratings.
rate
technology
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
: Glassdoor, a jobs and career community where employees can anonymously rate
: companies and CEOs, has just released its fourth annual Employees’ Choice
: Awards, listing the top 50 “Best Places to Work,” based on surveys
: collected from U.S. employees in 2011. The top five Best Places to Work,
: according to employees, are: Bain & Company, McKinsey & Company, Facebook,
: MITRE, and Google.
: Looking at just the tech sector, the 2012 best places to work in technology
: are Facebook, MITRE Google, Apple and Rackspace. Facebook actually slipped
: from the top spot last year to number 3 on the 2012 list and Google had
: moved up to the fifth slot from number 30 on last year’s list.
| v***n
发帖数: 5085 | 5 上玻璃门的程序员没几个会夸自己公司的。。。
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 谢谢。怎么热门的A，M，L,T,Z等都没有上榜呢？
| P**********c
发帖数: 3417 | 6 L's overall score is 3.9, looking at the score it should be on the list but
it doesn't have enough ratings to qualify. T only has 3 ratings in total,
2 within 2011, certainly wouldn't qualify either.
Glassdoor is just glassdoor, it doesn't have a lot of data, especially data within a year. Getting employees to reveal their ratings of the company they work for and their salaries, etc. is a tough job. BTW, Glassdoor itself has a 4.8 rating. Looking at the score alone it should be ranked first but sadly it doesn't have enough ratings either.
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 谢谢。怎么热门的A，M，L,T,Z等都没有上榜呢？
| p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 7
but
data within a year. Getting employees to reveal their ratings of the company
they work for and their salaries, etc. is a tough job. BTW, Glassdoor
itself has a 4.8 rating. Looking at the score alone it should be ranked
first but sadly it doesn't have enough ratings either.
谢谢。看来参考价值也不大。
【在 P**********c 的大作中提到】
: L's overall score is 3.9, looking at the score it should be on the list but
: it doesn't have enough ratings to qualify. T only has 3 ratings in total,
: 2 within 2011, certainly wouldn't qualify either.
: Glassdoor is just glassdoor, it doesn't have a lot of data, especially data within a year. Getting employees to reveal their ratings of the company they work for and their salaries, etc. is a tough job. BTW, Glassdoor itself has a 4.8 rating. Looking at the score alone it should be ranked first but sadly it doesn't have enough ratings either.
| P**********c
发帖数: 3417 | 8 Well, I think it is better than Forbes, at least these are real people
ranking their companies. Forbes just collects some random inaccurate data
and uses some random criteria to rank the companies.
But yeah, like every ranking, it suffers from lots of problems like sample
size, different expectations of people according to experience,
qualifications, industry, location, etc.
company
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: but
: data within a year. Getting employees to reveal their ratings of the company
: they work for and their salaries, etc. is a tough job. BTW, Glassdoor
: itself has a 4.8 rating. Looking at the score alone it should be ranked
: first but sadly it doesn't have enough ratings either.
: 谢谢。看来参考价值也不大。
|
|
