s*********5
发帖数: 514 | 1 At its current level of profitability, it will take Facebook Inc. until mid-
2013 at the earliest to earn enough operating income just to offset its
annual stock-compensation costs.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebook-stock-costs-will-wipe |
y*******g
发帖数: 6599 | |
s*********5
发帖数: 514 | 3 那为啥还专门报道一下？
【在 y*******g 的大作中提到】
: 刚上市公司都这样。没什么
|
y*******g
发帖数: 6599 | 4 新闻人无聊呗。fb的股票又没有因为这个报道而大跌。
【在 s*********5 的大作中提到】
: 那为啥还专门报道一下？
|
C****y
发帖数: 1277 | 5 如今FLAGMTVS等等给这么高的package,算是IT泡沫吗? 能持续多久? |
P**********c
发帖数: 3417 | 6 This is common for any recently IPOed company. Facebook is not alone. Most
of their costs go to stock based compensation. The higher their stocks go,
the higher that cost becomes. Those millionaires produced all have to be
accounted as expense for the company. That's why P/E means nothing for these
companies and wall street usually looks at adjusted earnings. It is not
like the company is actually paying anything for these stocks.
mid-
【在 s*********5 的大作中提到】
: At its current level of profitability, it will take Facebook Inc. until mid-
: 2013 at the earliest to earn enough operating income just to offset its
: annual stock-compensation costs.
: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebook-stock-costs-will-wipe
|
s*********5
发帖数: 514 | 7 Didn't understand this.
The company pays for the stock from it's own pocket, right?
these
【在 P**********c 的大作中提到】
: This is common for any recently IPOed company. Facebook is not alone. Most
: of their costs go to stock based compensation. The higher their stocks go,
: the higher that cost becomes. Those millionaires produced all have to be
: accounted as expense for the company. That's why P/E means nothing for these
: companies and wall street usually looks at adjusted earnings. It is not
: like the company is actually paying anything for these stocks.
:
: mid-
|
y*******g
发帖数: 6599 | 8 没办法，按美国的accounting 规定，这个就是算公司支出
【在 s*********5 的大作中提到】
: Didn't understand this.
: The company pays for the stock from it's own pocket, right?
:
: these
|
g*********e
发帖数: 14401 | 9 the company buys stock from the market and give them to the coders. |
t***j
发帖数: 2620 | 10 事实也是，现在买股票的股东是不停被稀释的，所以股价得打折
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 y*******g 的大作中提到】
: 没办法，按美国的accounting 规定，这个就是算公司支出
|
P**********c
发帖数: 3417 | 11 刚IPO的公司，stock就是给investor buy in的机会啊。哪有刚IPO就开始share
buyback的。对大部分公司来说，stock是应该计在expense里，否则公司可以只发stock
把R&D cost变成0. 但是对IPO成功的公司来说，他们发这些stock的时候根本不知道值
多少钱，同类型上市多年的公司不可能发相对等的stock, 这些股票已经出去了，当初
对公司来说就是paper money, 如果IPO胎死腹中就一钱不值的东西。后来反而价格冲
的越高算成公司cost就越高，就不太合理了。
【在 s*********5 的大作中提到】
: Didn't understand this.
: The company pays for the stock from it's own pocket, right?
:
: these
|
