c****x
发帖数: 6601 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: cccpwx (flg政庇小学生), 信区: Military
标 题: 移除国别限制，三哥又淫了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Aug 5 00:25:05 2018, 美东)
首先我也不是专家，有说错的地方请更正。
https://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/32734613.html
由于众所周知的原因，印度人，中国人绿卡都有比较长的排期，印度人的非常长，所以
他们就原因成立各种组织，然后募捐，去说服各种议员。h4 ead.
就是这样通过的，但是95%的h4 ead就是印度人拿到的。虽然现在也要取消了。
现在每年职业移门按国别限制，每个国家出身的分到的名额是一定且一样的，由于印度
人工作签证是国人的小10倍，绿卡申请数量也有6，7倍，所以排期自然就长很多。
涉及绿卡数量，名额分配的都是bill，要house先vote 过了，senate再vote 过了，然
后总统签字。几年前关于h1工资要求改革的bill好几个，但是连house vote都没到，因
为house内部有很多委员会，他们必须先vote，同意才能整个house vote。. 牛人云集,
一亩三分地
hr392 的bill是印度人很早提出来就想通过的. Waral 博客有更多文章,
http://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/392
他们要移除国别限制，这样的话，现在职业移门的名额将绝大多数分给他们，因为他们
很老的排期还有很多。然后全世界所有那些没有职业移门排期的国家，都会立刻有很长
的排期。
后来印度人发现，hr392这个bill很难直接独立的被vote，于是他们开始各种加塞到各
种别的移民相关的bill里，希望别的移民相关的bill通过，顺带通过hr392. 对于两党
来说，他们都不关心职业移民的问题，但是关心建墙，dreamer等的移民问题。幸运的
是，以前的他们能加塞的bill都没过。
印度人自己的讨论：
http://twitter.com/hashtag/hr392?lang=en
http://www.trackitt.com/usa-discussion-forums/i140/1715865395/h-r-392-fairness-for-high-skilled-immigrants%E2%80%A6/page/last_page
这次他们又来了, Rep Yode把它又加入了funding bill
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/s3109
本来funding bill就不应该有移民相关的bill，但是funding bill最后肯定会以某种形
式在house，和senate通过，否则有些政府部门就的关门。
所以大家要行动起来，联系当地house reps, senate reps，就去他们的网站，直接搜
索你所在的选区，比如CA第几选区，然后就会显示reps是谁，他们都有网站的。最后附
一份别人写的信：
Dear Rep XXX,
I am writing this letter to urge you to oppose an amendment to the Fiscal -
google 1point3acres
Year 2019 Homeland Security Funding Bill that “provides additional
flexibility related to the country cap on high-skilled workers under the H1-
B visa program.”
First of first, the description of the amendment shows how illy informed Rep
Yoder is. There is NO law that defines country cap on high-skilled workers
under the H-1B (not H1-B) visa program. In other words, there is no country .
cap on high-skilled workers under the H-1B visa program at all. What
flexibility can this amendment bring to something that does not exist?
What the amendment really does is to remove per-country limit on employment-
based green card (permanent residency) allotment. The 7% per-country limit,
set by the Immigration Act of 1990, serves the good purpose of diversity for
about 30 years without any problem until recent years.
About 10 years ago a few IT consulting companies from one country found the
leapholes of temporary work visas including L1, H-1B, B1 and B2. They have
brought millions of workers from their home country to US. And many of the .
workers then applied for green cards. As a result, there is a backlog for
those people from that country even though they already take about 30% (7%
from: 1point3acres cap plus spillovers) of the annual quota.
I understand that pain for those waiting for years for green card. And I
hope there is a good solution for them without hurting US citizens much.
However, the amendment by Rep Yoder is so unthoughtful and unbalanced that
it benefits ONLY citizens from a single country and hurts EVERYONE ELSE
including Americans.
Bear in mind that the backlog was partially caused by temp work visa abuse.
Senator Glassley from Iowa and then Senator Sessions from Alabama have
published multiple reports with regard to this issue. The abuse has resulted
in massive layoffs across all industries and tens of thousands of US
citizens lost their jobs to those consulting companies that bring cheap
labor from their home country. A good way to fix the backlog problem is to
stop the abuse. However, Rep Yoder’s amendment does nothing to stop the
abuse. Rather, it encourages abuse by trying to offer the abusers an easier
path to US.
Furthermore, should the cap be removed, nearly 100% of the green cards will
be
allocated to the citizens of a single country in the first 10 years. This is
against the intention of employment-based green card system which is to
bring smart and hard-working people from around the world, and will greatly
hurt diversity. | c****n
发帖数: 97 | 2 要寄給Chuck Grassley. 他對職業移民的課題很關注
我把格式整理一下
去這網站寄信 https://www.grassley.senate.gov/constituents/questions-and-
comments
Dear Rep Glassley,
I am writing this letter to urge you to oppose an amendment to the
Fiscal Year 2019 Homeland Security Funding Bill that “provides additional
flexibility related to the country cap on high-skilled workers under the H1-
B visa program.”
First of first, the description of the amendment shows how illy informed Rep
Yoder is. There is NO law that defines country cap on high-skilled workers
under the H-1B (not H1-B) visa program. In other words, there is no country
cap on high-skilled workers under the H-1B visa program at all. What
flexibility can this amendment bring to something that does not exist?
What the amendment really does is to remove per-country limit on employment-
based green card (permanent residency) allotment. The 7% per-country limit,
set by the Immigration Act of 1990, serves the good purpose of diversity for
about 30 years without any problem until recent years.
About 10 years ago a few IT consulting companies from one country found the
loopholes of temporary work visas including L1, H-1B, B1 and B2. They have
brought millions of workers from their home country to US. And many of the
workers then applied for green cards. As a result, there is a backlog for
those people from that country even though they already take about 30% (7%
cap plus spillovers) of the annual quota.
I understand that pain for those waiting for years for green card. And I
hope there is a good solution for them without hurting US citizens much.
However, the amendment by Rep Yoder is so unthoughtful and unbalanced that
it benefits ONLY citizens from a single country and hurts EVERYONE ELSE
including Americans.
Bear in mind that the backlog was partially caused by temp work visa abuse.
I know you, Senator Glassley from Iowa and then Senator Sessions from
Alabama have
published multiple reports with regard to this issue. The abuse has resulted
in massive layoffs across all industries and tens of thousands of US
citizens lost their jobs to those consulting companies that bring cheap
labor from their home country. A good way to fix the backlog problem is to
stop the abuse. However, Rep Yoder’s amendment does nothing to stop the
abuse. Rather, it encourages abuse by trying to offer the abusers an easier
path to US.
Furthermore, should the cap be removed, nearly 100% of the green cards will
be allocated to the citizens of a single country in the first 10 years. This
is against the intention of employment-based green card system which is to
bring smart and hard-working people from around the world, and will greatly
hurt diversity. | T*******e
发帖数: 4928 | 3 赞。
这次HR392是附在funding bill上，如果大家不专门反对
这个amendment，就有可能九，十月份会跟funding bill
一起通过vote。所以能反对的赶快跟house/senate reps
去反对。不要以为已经有绿卡或是2014 2015 年pd 的能在法案
实施混过去。这个amendment影响很坏。如果通过，以后
eb23 绿卡绝大部分都是印度的，而且大部分是ICC的。
想知道HR392的宣传者在人背后是怎么谋划着恐吓欺骗骚扰HR392
的反对者的，可以看看他们的策略包括stalking F-1 international, taking
pictures of them and their license plates：
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ae4cvsef47q45rm/Immigration_Voice_Summer_2018_
Advocacy_Guide.pdf?dl=0
H1-
Rep
【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: 要寄給Chuck Grassley. 他對職業移民的課題很關注
: 我把格式整理一下
: 去這網站寄信 https://www.grassley.senate.gov/constituents/questions-and-
: comments
: Dear Rep Glassley,
: I am writing this letter to urge you to oppose an amendment to the
: Fiscal Year 2019 Homeland Security Funding Bill that “provides additional
: flexibility related to the country cap on high-skilled workers under the H1-
: B visa program.”
: First of first, the description of the amendment shows how illy informed Rep
| T*******e
发帖数: 4928 | 4 赞。
这次HR392是附在funding bill上，如果大家不专门反对
这个amendment，就有可能九，十月份会跟funding bill
一起通过vote。所以能反对的赶快跟house/senate reps
去反对。不要以为已经有绿卡或是2014 2015 年pd 的能在法案
实施混过去。这个amendment影响很坏。如果通过，以后
eb23 绿卡绝大部分都是印度的，而且大部分是ICC的。
想知道HR392的宣传者在人背后是怎么谋划着恐吓欺骗骚扰HR392
的反对者的，可以看看他们的策略包括stalking F-1 international, taking
pictures of them and their license plates：
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ae4cvsef47q45rm/Immigration_Voice_Summer_2018_
Advocacy_Guide.pdf?dl=0
相关的印度群体已经在轮番给house/senate reps打电话为
HR392做宣传了。
H1-
Rep
【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: 要寄給Chuck Grassley. 他對職業移民的課題很關注
: 我把格式整理一下
: 去這網站寄信 https://www.grassley.senate.gov/constituents/questions-and-
: comments
: Dear Rep Glassley,
: I am writing this letter to urge you to oppose an amendment to the
: Fiscal Year 2019 Homeland Security Funding Bill that “provides additional
: flexibility related to the country cap on high-skilled workers under the H1-
: B visa program.”
: First of first, the description of the amendment shows how illy informed Rep
|
|
