Joke版 - 恐怖医生 美国男子割包皮被切掉阴茎 |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 1 只是去医院动割包皮手术，手术完成醒来后，却发现自己的宝贝「荡然无存」；这么不
可思议的事情，并不是出现在恐怖电影，而是在美国的肯塔基州，残酷上演。
64岁的卡车司机西顿（Phillip Seaton）在2007年时因为阴茎发炎，于是到医院找了派
特森医生（John Patterson）进行包皮手术。没想到都进了手术室，派特森才发现西顿
的阴茎上有恶性肿瘤，于是在未得到病患的同意下，就将他的阴茎切除。
西顿在手术醒来准备上厕所时，赫然发现自己的阴茎竟然完全不见了，当下觉得自己犹
如跌入18层地狱般的绝望。而此事件引发争议的另个点是，其实手术时，西顿的老婆黛
博拉在手术室外，医生却也没征询她的意见。
派特森医师的说法是，从西顿看诊，一直到进入手术准备区时，黛博拉都没有陪在他身
边，派特森对于这点觉得很诡异，所以才决定帮西顿割除阴茎时，不询问黛博拉。但黛
博拉却表示，若她有被征询的话，她一定会要求立即停止手术，直到西顿能表达自己的
意愿。
而对西顿来说，最痛苦的事还没结束，因为后来他阴茎上的肿瘤被检验出来，仅为癌症
初期，其实并不需要将它整个切除，也因此，西顿对医院提出求偿。但因为双方对于赔
偿条件并无共识，所以才使得事情闹上法院，而目前尚未做出最后判决。 | R***a
发帖数: 41892 | 2 最后再查查，不是内裤掉色引起的么？
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 只是去医院动割包皮手术，手术完成醒来后，却发现自己的宝贝「荡然无存」；这么不
: 可思议的事情，并不是出现在恐怖电影，而是在美国的肯塔基州，残酷上演。
: 64岁的卡车司机西顿（Phillip Seaton）在2007年时因为阴茎发炎，于是到医院找了派
: 特森医生（John Patterson）进行包皮手术。没想到都进了手术室，派特森才发现西顿
: 的阴茎上有恶性肿瘤，于是在未得到病患的同意下，就将他的阴茎切除。
: 西顿在手术醒来准备上厕所时，赫然发现自己的阴茎竟然完全不见了，当下觉得自己犹
: 如跌入18层地狱般的绝望。而此事件引发争议的另个点是，其实手术时，西顿的老婆黛
: 博拉在手术室外，医生却也没征询她的意见。
: 派特森医师的说法是，从西顿看诊，一直到进入手术准备区时，黛博拉都没有陪在他身
: 边，派特森对于这点觉得很诡异，所以才决定帮西顿割除阴茎时，不询问黛博拉。但黛
| s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 3 好狠。。。
这个医生一定是被卡车司机什么什么过所以有怨恨
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 只是去医院动割包皮手术，手术完成醒来后，却发现自己的宝贝「荡然无存」；这么不
: 可思议的事情，并不是出现在恐怖电影，而是在美国的肯塔基州，残酷上演。
: 64岁的卡车司机西顿（Phillip Seaton）在2007年时因为阴茎发炎，于是到医院找了派
: 特森医生（John Patterson）进行包皮手术。没想到都进了手术室，派特森才发现西顿
: 的阴茎上有恶性肿瘤，于是在未得到病患的同意下，就将他的阴茎切除。
: 西顿在手术醒来准备上厕所时，赫然发现自己的阴茎竟然完全不见了，当下觉得自己犹
: 如跌入18层地狱般的绝望。而此事件引发争议的另个点是，其实手术时，西顿的老婆黛
: 博拉在手术室外，医生却也没征询她的意见。
: 派特森医师的说法是，从西顿看诊，一直到进入手术准备区时，黛博拉都没有陪在他身
: 边，派特森对于这点觉得很诡异，所以才决定帮西顿割除阴茎时，不询问黛博拉。但黛
| R***a
发帖数: 41892 | 4 其实关键人物是卡车司机的老婆那个什么戴勃拉
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 好狠。。。
: 这个医生一定是被卡车司机什么什么过所以有怨恨
| p*********w
发帖数: 23432 | 5 没收费就不承担责任
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 只是去医院动割包皮手术，手术完成醒来后，却发现自己的宝贝「荡然无存」；这么不
: 可思议的事情，并不是出现在恐怖电影，而是在美国的肯塔基州，残酷上演。
: 64岁的卡车司机西顿（Phillip Seaton）在2007年时因为阴茎发炎，于是到医院找了派
: 特森医生（John Patterson）进行包皮手术。没想到都进了手术室，派特森才发现西顿
: 的阴茎上有恶性肿瘤，于是在未得到病患的同意下，就将他的阴茎切除。
: 西顿在手术醒来准备上厕所时，赫然发现自己的阴茎竟然完全不见了，当下觉得自己犹
: 如跌入18层地狱般的绝望。而此事件引发争议的另个点是，其实手术时，西顿的老婆黛
: 博拉在手术室外，医生却也没征询她的意见。
: 派特森医师的说法是，从西顿看诊，一直到进入手术准备区时，黛博拉都没有陪在他身
: 边，派特森对于这点觉得很诡异，所以才决定帮西顿割除阴茎时，不询问黛博拉。但黛
| e********t
发帖数: 9607 | | h********8
发帖数: 7355 | | G*******s
发帖数: 10605 | 8 割包皮的医生也管肿瘤？有点不可思议啊
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 只是去医院动割包皮手术，手术完成醒来后，却发现自己的宝贝「荡然无存」；这么不
: 可思议的事情，并不是出现在恐怖电影，而是在美国的肯塔基州，残酷上演。
: 64岁的卡车司机西顿（Phillip Seaton）在2007年时因为阴茎发炎，于是到医院找了派
: 特森医生（John Patterson）进行包皮手术。没想到都进了手术室，派特森才发现西顿
: 的阴茎上有恶性肿瘤，于是在未得到病患的同意下，就将他的阴茎切除。
: 西顿在手术醒来准备上厕所时，赫然发现自己的阴茎竟然完全不见了，当下觉得自己犹
: 如跌入18层地狱般的绝望。而此事件引发争议的另个点是，其实手术时，西顿的老婆黛
: 博拉在手术室外，医生却也没征询她的意见。
: 派特森医师的说法是，从西顿看诊，一直到进入手术准备区时，黛博拉都没有陪在他身
: 边，派特森对于这点觉得很诡异，所以才决定帮西顿割除阴茎时，不询问黛博拉。但黛
| s****l
发帖数: 10462 | 9 医生要是才32岁，肯定划不来，老头子好歹64了，估计人间滋味尝了不少
【在 e********t 的大作中提到】
: 这个要一鸡还一鸡。
| l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 10 病人输了，而且事情跟病人自己说的不太一样
Ky. jury rules against penis amputation patient
SHELBYVILLE, Ky. (AP) — A Kentucky truck driver who was wheeled into
surgery for a simple circumcision but awoke without part of his penis lost
his multimillion-dollar lawsuit Wednesday against the urologist who cut off
a cancer-riddled section of the organ.
A six-man, six-woman jury deliberated briefly before saying it didn't agree
with 64-year-old Phillip Seaton and his wife, Deborah, that Dr. John
Patterson had failed to exercise proper care. Seaton also sued because he
said he hadn't consented to the amputation.
The doctor said he decided to amputate less than an inch of the penis after
he found potentially deadly cancer during surgery in 2007. The rest of the
penis was taken off later by another doctor.
Patterson testified that when he cut the foreskin, the tip of the penis had
the appearance of rotten cauliflower, indicating cancer. A pathologist later
testified that tests confirmed the diagnosis.
"What I saw was not a penis. What I saw was cancer," Patterson had testified.
His attorney said during the three-day trial in Shelby County Circuit Court
that the doctor saved Seaton's life with his decisive action.
Seaton's attorney countered that Patterson should have sewn up his patient
and consulted with the couple about such a life-altering surgery and his
options to treat the cancer.
"He was mutilated," attorney Kevin George said during closing arguments that
took about as long as the jury deliberations. "His manhood was taken."
All jurors, including the forewoman, declined to comment as they filed out
of the courthouse after the trial.
Seaton, a former truck driver from Waddy with a long, gray ponytail and gray
beard, and his wife of 35 years had been seeking nearly $16 million in
damages for "loss of service, love and affection." They declined to comment
after the verdict.
George said he planned to appeal on grounds that a doctor is allowed to
change a consent for surgery only if there is a danger of imminent death.
"There was no emergency, no reason to do it," George said of the amputation.
Seaton, who has limited reading skills, signed a consent form for the
circumcision. The doctor's lawyer said that consent gave Patterson the
latitude to deal with unforeseen circumstances during the surgery.
Patterson, who testified twice during the trial, said after the verdict, "I
think we're feeling pretty good." He declined to say more about the highly
publicized case, calling one reporter who tried to question him "a member of
the tabloid press."
"We feel like justice was done," said the doctor's attorney, Clay Robinson.
He said the doctor never wavered in his belief he did nothing wrong, but
added: "No doctor ever wins a malpractice action. It's just a matter of how
much you lose by."
The key question of the case revolved around whether Patterson should have
halted the surgery when he discovered the cancer, then consulted the Seatons
before taking further action.
The jury saw graphic photos of Seaton's groin after the surgery.
Seaton suffers from sleep apnea and high blood pressure and received Social
Security disability payments after arthritis and bad eyesight forced him to
give up his job hauling sand to construction sites, according to court
testimony. He never made it past the fifth grade in school, but can write
his name and recognize small words, according to his attorney.
Seaton showed little reaction through most of the three days of testimony
but said on the witness stand that he was a "bad case" emotionally after
hearing the news of the partial amputation and had wanted to run from the
hospital.
"I didn't have no say in it," Seaton said. "I wasn't told what had to be
done. It was just done."
According to court testimony, Seaton had told his general practitioner
during a routine examination that he was experiencing burning when he
urinated and was prescribed a cream. When symptoms persisted, the doctor
later referred Seaton to Patterson, who recommended a simple circumcision,
according to court testimony.
Seaton had testified that he had not been told prior to the surgery that it
would be anything but a circumcision, and had even joked with his doctor
about the procedure.
The doctor's attorney said Patterson prevented the cancer from spreading,
and called the claims of medical malpractice "nothing short of ridiculous."
"Mr. Seaton is here today with his family because that cancer was cured," he
said in closing remarks.
George said the ruling could have broad ramifications for patients whisked
into surgery.
"If this case stands, you go into a surgery ... whatever you consent for you
may end up having something done to you even when there is no emergency,"
he said.
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 只是去医院动割包皮手术，手术完成醒来后，却发现自己的宝贝「荡然无存」；这么不
: 可思议的事情，并不是出现在恐怖电影，而是在美国的肯塔基州，残酷上演。
: 64岁的卡车司机西顿（Phillip Seaton）在2007年时因为阴茎发炎，于是到医院找了派
: 特森医生（John Patterson）进行包皮手术。没想到都进了手术室，派特森才发现西顿
: 的阴茎上有恶性肿瘤，于是在未得到病患的同意下，就将他的阴茎切除。
: 西顿在手术醒来准备上厕所时，赫然发现自己的阴茎竟然完全不见了，当下觉得自己犹
: 如跌入18层地狱般的绝望。而此事件引发争议的另个点是，其实手术时，西顿的老婆黛
: 博拉在手术室外，医生却也没征询她的意见。
: 派特森医师的说法是，从西顿看诊，一直到进入手术准备区时，黛博拉都没有陪在他身
: 边，派特森对于这点觉得很诡异，所以才决定帮西顿割除阴茎时，不询问黛博拉。但黛
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
