d*****n 发帖数: 450 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 TheStrait 讨论区 】
【 原文由 oldguy 所发表 】
无关的人员是不能旁听案子的。这在民主国家是常识啊。 |
d*****n 发帖数: 450 | 2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
is it true in USA?
【在 d*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 【 以下文字转载自 TheStrait 讨论区 】 : 【 原文由 oldguy 所发表 】 : 无关的人员是不能旁听案子的。这在民主国家是常识啊。
|
l**********r 发帖数: 240 | 3 Don't think so.
Another common sense reasoning: Government/courts are supported by taxpayers'
money. Any taxpayer should be allowed to go to court and listen to the cases.
But there will be exceptions to this general rule.
吧?
记者,
【在 d*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : is it true in USA?
|
l**********r 发帖数: 240 | 4 学了一学期法律,觉得大多数时候法规的选择都是符合common
sense的,和林肯说的government by/for the people是一个道理。
taxpayers'
cases.
了
的
嘛?
【在 l**********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Don't think so. : Another common sense reasoning: Government/courts are supported by taxpayers' : money. Any taxpayer should be allowed to go to court and listen to the cases. : But there will be exceptions to this general rule. : : 吧? : 记者,
|
s**********i 发帖数: 711 | 5
unless the judge says because of some reason,
such as national security or person privacy,
all courts are open to public.
【在 d*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : is it true in USA?
|