f*****t 发帖数: 52 | 1 有人知道United States v. Detroit Lumber Co. 200 U.S. 321 这个判例对后来联邦最
高法院的判决前宣告有什么重要影响吗?
我看到,后来好多最高法院的案例都援引这个United States v. Detroit Lumber Co. 200
U.S. 321 ,但是不明白为什么.
What is the significance of United States v. Detroit Lumber Co. 200 U.S. 321
with respect to a Supreme Court syllabus?
请高人指点. | c**i 发帖数: 6973 | 2 I will answer your second question first. If you use the correct word
"syllabus"--if this is what you inquire--then it is easy. See headnote No. 4
in the sylabus, at page 322. It is nothing new. The warning is repeated in
each and every slip opinion.
As for your first question, read those subsquent opinions to see why it was
referred to or quoted. It is that simple.
最
200
【在 f*****t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 有人知道United States v. Detroit Lumber Co. 200 U.S. 321 这个判例对后来联邦最 : 高法院的判决前宣告有什么重要影响吗? : 我看到,后来好多最高法院的案例都援引这个United States v. Detroit Lumber Co. 200 : U.S. 321 ,但是不明白为什么. : What is the significance of United States v. Detroit Lumber Co. 200 U.S. 321 : with respect to a Supreme Court syllabus? : 请高人指点.
|
|