c******r
发帖数: 889 | 1 Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit
management, several computer experts
maintained that the most significant threat faced
by large institutions such as universities and
hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential
data. In light of this testimony, we should make
the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our
highest priority.
The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to
which one of the following objections?
(A) The argument confuses the causes of a proble |
h*****o
发帖数: 342 | 2 B?
【在 c******r 的大作中提到】
: Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit
: management, several computer experts
: maintained that the most significant threat faced
: by large institutions such as universities and
: hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential
: data. In light of this testimony, we should make
: the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our
: highest priority.
: The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to
: which one of the following objections?
|
y*****i
发帖数: 588 | 3 哈哈这道题我考过...当年出来对答按的时候吵的天翻地覆的！
【在 c******r 的大作中提到】
: Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit
: management, several computer experts
: maintained that the most significant threat faced
: by large institutions such as universities and
: hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential
: data. In light of this testimony, we should make
: the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our
: highest priority.
: The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to
: which one of the following objections?
|
c******r
发帖数: 889 | 4 You are right. The answer is B.
What troubles me is why the argument is vulnerable to B? Not "broad" enough
expertise, in what sense?
I have no problem if it says "some" experts doesn't mean consensus among
experts or majority of experts, or those "some experts" may not have enough
credential/authority so their opinion convincingly supports the conclusion.
But expertise not "broad" enough?
Can somebody explain it to me? Thanks. |
y*****i
发帖数: 588 | 5 不是说了吗那些是计算机专家...计算机专家对医院的管理应该没有什么权威性吧
【在 c******r 的大作中提到】
: Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit
: management, several computer experts
: maintained that the most significant threat faced
: by large institutions such as universities and
: hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential
: data. In light of this testimony, we should make
: the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our
: highest priority.
: The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to
: which one of the following objections?
|
c******r
发帖数: 889 | 6 This is comforting...I am not the only one that is troubled by the answer.
【在 y*****i 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈这道题我考过...当年出来对答按的时候吵的天翻地覆的！
|
y*****i
发帖数: 588 | 7 实际上我考了2次，每次出来对答案的时候都感觉我lr错了好多，其实最后都是那些貌
似有理的人错了...
虽然这玩意思叫logic reading,有时候还是感觉重要...
【在 c******r 的大作中提到】
: This is comforting...I am not the only one that is troubled by the answer.
|
c******r
发帖数: 889 | 8 就是说那个院长的结论是general的医院管理，而不是说医院的IT计算机数据系统等方
面的。。。一说保护confidentiality，不由自主就被带到database的思路上了...呵，
白受HIPPA训练了。看来是我带入了outside information, misunderstood the
conclusion. The conclusion is much broader than what I interpreted.
Scope shifted...
教训很多。一定要read it as it is。
【在 y*****i 的大作中提到】
: 不是说了吗那些是计算机专家...计算机专家对医院的管理应该没有什么权威性吧
|
g*********i
发帖数: 281 | 9 我的第一反应也是B
看了题之后，觉得最有问题的一点就是computer experts-->
problems with the management of large institutions
expertise和作证的问题不吻合
enough
enough
【在 c******r 的大作中提到】
: You are right. The answer is B.
: What troubles me is why the argument is vulnerable to B? Not "broad" enough
: expertise, in what sense?
: I have no problem if it says "some" experts doesn't mean consensus among
: experts or majority of experts, or those "some experts" may not have enough
: credential/authority so their opinion convincingly supports the conclusion.
: But expertise not "broad" enough?
: Can somebody explain it to me? Thanks.
|
y*****i
发帖数: 588 | 10 不过这种错误不是很典型ms,所以可能当时争议比较大吧
【在 g*********i 的大作中提到】
: 我的第一反应也是B
: 看了题之后，觉得最有问题的一点就是computer experts-->
: problems with the management of large institutions
: expertise和作证的问题不吻合
:
: enough
: enough
|
