s*******1
发帖数: 135 | 1 Publicity campaigns for endangered species are unlikely to have much impact
on the most important environmental problems, for while the ease of
attributing feelings to large mammals facilitates evoking sympathy for them,
it is more difficult to elicit sympathy for other kinds of organisms, such
asa thesoil microorganisms on which large ecosystems and agriculture depend.
A. Publicity campaigns for the envirnment are the most effective when they
elicit sympathy for some organism.
B. An organism ca |
g*****e
发帖数: 16 | 2 B is correct.
A is incorrect, because the paragraph does not discuss whether Publicity
campaigns are most effective. Instead, it focuses on "much impact". |
j***g
发帖数: 51 | 3 didn't give the question stem?? can't solve it
is it asking about 'assumption'?
the conclusion is 'Publicity campaigns for endangered species are unlikely
to have much impact on the most important environmental problem'
and there is a gap btw 'endangered species' and 'other kinds of organisms,
such as the soil microorganisms on which large ecosystems and agriculture
depend.'
so I think the author assumes these ''other kinds of organisms' (with
whatever feature described there) can be seen as 'e |
D**********s
发帖数: 320 | 4 I think A is correct.
Public campaigns are not effective because eliciting sympathy for
microorganism is difficult.
The missing link is eliciting sympathy makes public campaigns effective.
B seems irrelevant. |
