s*******1
发帖数: 135 | 1 Only an expert in some branch of psychology could understand why Patrick is
behaving irrationally. But no expert is certain of being able to solve
someone else's problem. Patrick wants to devise a solution to his own
behavioral problem.
Which one of the following conclusions can be validliy drawn from the
passage?
A. Patrick does not understand why he is behaving in this way.
B. patrick is not an expert in psychology.
C. Patrick is not certain of being able to devise a solution to his own
behavi | n***e
发帖数: 461 | 2 the question provide the following premise:
one understands why Patrick is behaving irrationally -> he is an expert in
some psychology -> he's not certain to solve sb else's behavioral problem.
only E is correct because it's an inverse negative statement of the above
relationship.
A: there's no indication Patrick does or does not understand why he is
behaving this way. either way, there won't be any violation of the above
relationship.
B: of course Patrick can be an expert. there's no place sugg | d********2
发帖数: 44 | 3 A: Patrick might be an expert himself, so might be able to understand;
B: same as A;
C: it just says that "no expert" is certain, which means that a non-expert,
might be certain, and Patrick might NOT be an expert;
D: "should" is obviously not the correct answer;
E: Charles is certain --> Charles is not an expert --> Charles does not
understand | s*******1
发帖数: 135 | |
|
