l********5
发帖数: 297 | 1 My previous landlord want to keep all my deposit ($950+92) by listing
several items (most of them are unreasonable) after 55 days I moved out and
sent her new address. The following is the communication between us. I plan
to sue here just according to Texas Property Code "30 days rule"(see the
following Code):
Me: “By law, you should return the deposit or give any response within 30
days after I wrote you my new address(On Sep. 2. 2008) (this is also stated
in the lease). You failed to do that, | i****y
发帖数: 5184 | 2 没看出来她怎么对不起你了ah.
and
plan
stated
me
【在 l********5 的大作中提到】
: My previous landlord want to keep all my deposit ($950+92) by listing
: several items (most of them are unreasonable) after 55 days I moved out and
: sent her new address. The following is the communication between us. I plan
: to sue here just according to Texas Property Code "30 days rule"(see the
: following Code):
: Me: “By law, you should return the deposit or give any response within 30
: days after I wrote you my new address(On Sep. 2. 2008) (this is also stated
: in the lease). You failed to do that,
| l********5
发帖数: 297 | 3 她扣了所有的押金.原因很勉强.而且是我搬出并通知她新地址在55天之后,这在德州已
经违反了法律.问题是她现在以Hurrican Ike为理由耽误了处理时间.这样的理由成立吗?
【在 i****y 的大作中提到】
: 没看出来她怎么对不起你了ah.
:
: and
: plan
: stated
: me
| r********e
发帖数: 86 | 4 so she is a bit late, so what. it's not a situation where time is of
essence, especially given the hurricane damages. law is still about common
sense most of the time.
if you want your money back, you should focus more on why the charges are
not reasonable, not the mere fact that she's late. Her late response can be
part of your argument, but cannot be the center of it. |
|
