s*******1
发帖数: 135 | 1 Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in hospital delivery
rooms to check fetal heartbeat, are more intrusive than ordinary
stethoscopes and do no more to improve the chances that a healthy baby will
be born. therefore, the additional cost of electronic monitoring is
unjustified and such monitoring should be discontinued.
Dr. Andrers: I disagree. ALthough you and I know that both methods are
capable of providing the same information, electronic monitoring has been
well worth the | n***e
发帖数: 461 | 2 anders raised a point that's not in dispute. kim merely say electronic
monitor is too expensive yet no more effective than steth. anders said "only
b/c electronic monitor now we can use steth more effectively". but suppose
anders answer is true, it does not show why electronic monitor should not be
discontinued. because after all, what's learned is learned, we already
learned it, so we no longer need the source to use the knowledge derived
from it.
i think you were probably thinking that ander' | a******r
发帖数: 38 | 3 assuming andres is right
the fact that electro monitor has help dr learn how to use steth better did
not justify its wide application in hospital
that is, since doc already know what to be watch out using steth, electro
monitor is no longer needed
therefore, andres argument didn't defend the position he took. |
|
