F****3 发帖数: 1504 | 1 如果可以需要哪些条件,有什么参考文献吗, westlaw之类?
谢谢! | o**********y 发帖数: 43 | 2 基本上不太可能:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Bilski
【在 F****3 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 如果可以需要哪些条件,有什么参考文献吗, westlaw之类? : 谢谢!
| F****3 发帖数: 1504 | 3 谢谢!是不是我在不同的巡回法院区就没关系啊? 另外是不是最高法院的解释要
narrower? | z***1 发帖数: 48 | 4 The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has the exclusive
jurisdiction on patent cases on appeal. That is, its decision is binding to
all lower federal courts. So far, In re Bilski is a good law, which is
unlikely to be overruled by the Supreme Court in a foreseeable future (in
view of its recent decision in Mayo v. Prometheus).
So it is unlikely that a pure business trading method would be a patentable
subject matter. |
|