f*******t
发帖数: 113 | 1 开始被搞，现在开始搞它了，呵呵
总得来说，写东西用这些东西好处多多。呵呵 |
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 2 比Linux好？Why?
【在 f*******t 的大作中提到】
: 开始被搞，现在开始搞它了，呵呵
: 总得来说，写东西用这些东西好处多多。呵呵
|
x****g
发帖数: 32 | 3 Differences:
1) FreeBSD is a whole system(kernal + user land) while Liunx is a kernal.
2) kernel is seperated from application
3) Upgrade the system is easy. Did your application break when you
upgrade
your linux distribution?
4) More stable than Linux
5) vi is not vim; make is not gmake. it is UNIX
6) simpler configruation, no run levels
7) no native flash player. Flash 7 works fine. Flash 9 doesn't work
8) aircrack-ng doesn't work
9) Freebsd ports are good. b
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: 比Linux好？Why?
|
D***D
发帖数: 5321 | 4
kernal.
Does this matter?
Don't understand.
Yes, both in FreeBSD and linux distributions.
Try Slackware.
That's why it is ports, not pkg_add.
Does't matter.
Good. You can always mount ext2 .
【在 x****g 的大作中提到】
: Differences:
: 1) FreeBSD is a whole system(kernal + user land) while Liunx is a kernal.
: 2) kernel is seperated from application
: 3) Upgrade the system is easy. Did your application break when you
: upgrade
: your linux distribution?
: 4) More stable than Linux
: 5) vi is not vim; make is not gmake. it is UNIX
: 6) simpler configruation, no run levels
: 7) no native flash player. Flash 7 works fine. Flash 9 doesn't work
|
l***e
发帖数: 480 | 5 1.hardware support is not as good as Linux
2.they(core team) are not interested in helping entry level |
