G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 1 words came 5000 years ago. but punctuation symbol came just 100 years ago.
why our ancients could not invent the punctuation symbol during
the 5000 years of history? |
J**S
发帖数: 25790 | |
G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 3 I think we really need to think about this question seriously.
Your points don't stand.
A lot of Tang poems were for kids.
Could it be that our ancient were actually not smart?
or save the paper which was very expensive?
in ancient China, paper are very expensive. so publishers didn't add
punctuation symbols in the article.
They leave this task to the readers.
【在 J**S 的大作中提到】
: 为的是，不让没学问的人看懂。
|
J**S
发帖数: 25790 | 4 文言文是给读书人和官场用的。。
有文化的人，就应该看的懂； 没文化的人就应该看不懂，这就是人家要的。
这就是古代的等级制度。 都用白话文，还怎么区分文化人和乡野村夫啊？
打个比方：就是女人买包包一样，女人就手里挎个几万元的名牌包包，买它，人家就是
因为它贵，才买它。 手挎一个连打工仔都买的起的包，人家能有面子吗？
同理， 没有标点符号，难理解。 文化人就喜欢不让白丁理解，所以没有标点.
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: I think we really need to think about this question seriously.
: Your points don't stand.
: A lot of Tang poems were for kids.
: Could it be that our ancient were actually not smart?
: or save the paper which was very expensive?
: in ancient China, paper are very expensive. so publishers didn't add
: punctuation symbols in the article.
: They leave this task to the readers.
|
G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 5 “泰西各国书籍，其句读勾勒，讲解甚烦。如果句意义足，则记‘。’；意未足，则记
‘，’；意虽不足，而义与上句黏合，则记‘；’；又意未足，外补充一句，则记‘：
’；语之诧异叹赏者，则记‘！’；问句则记‘?’；引证典据，于句之前后记‘“”
’；另加注解，于句之前后记‘（）’；又于两段相连之处，则加一横如‘——’。”
【在 J**S 的大作中提到】
: 文言文是给读书人和官场用的。。
: 有文化的人，就应该看的懂； 没文化的人就应该看不懂，这就是人家要的。
: 这就是古代的等级制度。 都用白话文，还怎么区分文化人和乡野村夫啊？
: 打个比方：就是女人买包包一样，女人就手里挎个几万元的名牌包包，买它，人家就是
: 因为它贵，才买它。 手挎一个连打工仔都买的起的包，人家能有面子吗？
: 同理， 没有标点符号，难理解。 文化人就喜欢不让白丁理解，所以没有标点.
|
