w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 1 Basically I think the second choice would be better when one cannot be
that great as de Gennes, Edwards, or Freed (though I don't think Freed
is parallel to the former two as to their contributions...:-(). Currently
Muthukumar and Rubinstein are more precisely defined as polymer physicists in
US.
Yes, I do agree on your conclusion that Bio-field currently seems isolated
from polymer physics though many biophysicists are doing some experiments
on the single chain of DNA or protein. To me, those e | t*******s
发帖数: 9 | 2 the group I am in presents an interesting mix of physicist/chemist/masterial
sciencist that casine referred to, working on theory/simulations/experiments.
Theory guys draw heavily on the tools like field theoretical approaches, while
material scientists play with mean field ones to interpret their data.
Regarding bio, it is interesting to note that physicists like muthu,
rubinstein,
monica, yethiraj,are all active on polyelectrolyte, prototype model for
biomolecules. To bring scaling princeples,
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: Basically I think the second choice would be better when one cannot be
: that great as de Gennes, Edwards, or Freed (though I don't think Freed
: is parallel to the former two as to their contributions...:-(). Currently
: Muthukumar and Rubinstein are more precisely defined as polymer physicists in
: US.
: Yes, I do agree on your conclusion that Bio-field currently seems isolated
: from polymer physics though many biophysicists are doing some experiments
: on the single chain of DNA or protein. To me, those e
| c*****e
发帖数: 238 | 3
I agree on this, Karl Freed is the only one in U.S. I would mention since Flory
has died... (Flory is really an excellent physicist) Freed seems to have used
physics very much, but did not contribute a lot to physics.
Well, I always tried to acquire some basic training as a physicist. Maybe that
is just a waste of time...
I'll read it when I have some time. Sorry for the delay on your requests..
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: Basically I think the second choice would be better when one cannot be
: that great as de Gennes, Edwards, or Freed (though I don't think Freed
: is parallel to the former two as to their contributions...:-(). Currently
: Muthukumar and Rubinstein are more precisely defined as polymer physicists in
: US.
: Yes, I do agree on your conclusion that Bio-field currently seems isolated
: from polymer physics though many biophysicists are doing some experiments
: on the single chain of DNA or protein. To me, those e
|
|
