z****o
发帖数: 368 | 1 刚看到这篇文章，06年的文章，正儿八经的问卷结果。看样子research experience的
重要性并
不像大家想的那么高。最重要的是临床的performance，比如第一位的“Grades in
required
clerkships”
有PDF可以打印
http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2009/03000/Selection_C
riteria_for_Residency__Results_of_a.24.aspx
希望有经验的同学多多讨论一下。建议没有match上的同学最好把自己的credential贴
一下，大家
也好讨论一下什么原因没有match上。也希望match上的同学也贴一下credential，让后
来人有个
标尺。
建议按照下面的格式,如果回信多于20个我将负责整理结果,希望能够成为我们CMG的参
考。
specialty applied:
total program number applied:
matched or not?
step1 score:
step2 CK score:
ste | t*********m
发帖数: 360 | 2 Don't get confused.
This is NOT for CMG.
For us, research experience is very important, because this is the only
thing most of us have. | z****o
发帖数: 368 | 3 yes, I agree with you. we should improve what ever we can improve. but we
should also think about the importance of those factors. For example, based
on the paper, step1 and step2 scores are much more important than the
research experience. so the the effort we put into the steps will have
higher yield than into researches. |
|
