f****b
发帖数: 2410 | 1 I withdraw it voluntarily. If you like to read the article, PM me.
Thank you for reading | p*****n
发帖数: 97 | 2 读了邮报,真是一个悲剧.我觉得袁可能并不是单对林发难,而是对Boeke和整个环境.只
是链子总是在最薄弱的地方断掉.倒霉的是林和他的家人.林看来还是有底线的,只是吃
亏的总是有底线的人. | f****b
发帖数: 2410 | 3 Hopkins responds to the article
At Johns Hopkins, research adheres to highest levels of integrity
Published: March 22
The March 12 front-page article “Behind acclaimed research, doubts”
contained serious flaws. First, it was based heavily on the perspective of
one former Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine employee. Second,
three key points we made to The Post’s reporter were not reflected in the
report:
●We explained that we don’t discuss personnel issues with the media.
●We noted that the former employee, Daniel Yuan, first expressed his
concerns about a paper in the journal Nature last May, five months after his
employment ended.
●We emphasized that discussion and debate are encouraged in research,
particularly in labs at Johns Hopkins, and that peer-reviewed journals have
a mechanism for airing questions and making corrections.
In light of inferences that have been drawn from public interpretations of
the article, it is important to make clear that Dr. Yuan’s Johns Hopkins
employment did not terminate because he challenged data. In fact, senior
investigator Jef Boeke extended Dr. Yuan’s employment for two years after
the grant that supported Dr. Yuan’s salary ended, to give Dr. Yuan a chance
to submit new grant applications. The e-mails quoted in the article to
support Dr. Yuan’s claims relate to a different, as yet unpublished, study.
In contrast to the article’s characterization of our response, both Dr.
Boeke and Johns Hopkins have taken Dr. Yuan’s comments extremely seriously
and have spent considerable effort evaluating the work in question. Careful
scientific investigation and peer review take time. This process of
publication, debate and correction undergirds the entire research endeavor
that advances new discovery. At the conclusion of our evaluation, if issues
are identified, we will take appropriate measures.
At Johns Hopkins, we are extremely grateful to receive federal research
funding. We take seriously our responsibility as stewards of that funding,
holding ourselves to the highest standards of integrity.
Landon S. King, Baltimore
The writer is executive vice dean and vice dean for research at the
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. | A*******s
发帖数: 9638 | 4 Thanks for sharing. Now I understand a little more about your claim. It is
interesting but sad: Dr.Yuan lost his job anyway.
What lesson should we draw from this, LZ? | A*******s
发帖数: 9638 | 5 “We emphasized that discussion and debate are encouraged in research,
particularly in labs at Johns Hopkins, and that peer-reviewed journals have
a mechanism for airing questions and making corrections.”
我想这就是Dr.Yuan的问题所在。
在医院里，如果看到别的医生做了不合常理的事，你是与该医生交谈呢，还是报告医院
领导（medical director） 还是直接打电话通知媒体呢？ | A*******s
发帖数: 9638 | 6 That is right, not to talk to public for sure.
If you are involved in the case, you should do whatever is right. But what
if you just heard the story but not on the case, then what?
lol | A*******s
发帖数: 9638 | 7 Big difference. Depend who you are. :) | f****b
发帖数: 2410 | 8 必须搞清楚来龙去脉，才有教训可谈，２０００年他还在clinician scientist
track
that winning article made him clinician scientist track 2000.
2001 totally off the track. going into Boekee Lab.
more suspcious, is he let lisence expired 2005.
【在 A*******s 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for sharing. Now I understand a little more about your claim. It is
: interesting but sad: Dr.Yuan lost his job anyway.
: What lesson should we draw from this, LZ?
| k********n
发帖数: 756 | 9 He is American.
The lab was not fabricating the data.
He was challenging the methodology in the paper from his boss when he worked
in his boss's lab.
The author committed suicide
It is not a surprise that he was fired.
The old saying: if you don't have competitive advantage, don't compete. | A*******s
发帖数: 9638 | 10 If you don't try, how do you know you are in disadvantage?
worked
【在 k********n 的大作中提到】
: He is American.
: The lab was not fabricating the data.
: He was challenging the methodology in the paper from his boss when he worked
: in his boss's lab.
: The author committed suicide
: It is not a surprise that he was fired.
: The old saying: if you don't have competitive advantage, don't compete.
| c****l
发帖数: 1086 | 11 If you do not kill a person with a gun, how do you know gun can slaughter? :)
【在 A*******s 的大作中提到】
: If you don't try, how do you know you are in disadvantage?
:
: worked
|
|
