c**i
发帖数: 6973 | 1 Transcript: Media Availability with Secretary Gates en route to Beijing,
China from Andrews Air Force Base. Office of the Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Public Affairs), US DEpartment of Defense.
http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid
Quote:
(a) China alleged intention to buy
"Q: Mr. Secretary, would you consider the sale of U.S.
helicopters – non-military variety of helicopters to China if they asked?
"SECRETARY GATES: That’s the first I’ve ever heard of it, so
I would have to –
"Q: They’ve said they want to buy certain kinds of dual-use
helicopters – (inaudible).
"SECRETARY GATES: I’d have to look at it. I just – I don’t
want to answer just off the top of my head.
(b) J-20
"Q: Secretary, considering the revelations recently about the
new ballistic missile that the Chinese are developing faster than American
– the U.S. intelligence thought and the stealth fighter photos which have
come out, does this – first of all, does this lend any additional urgency
to your visit? Are you particularly concerned about that? And secondly,
are you doing anything to address the possible – or checking to possible
intelligence lapses that allowed them to get further than expected?
"SECRETARY GATES: Well, I think, first of all, we’ve been
watching these developments all along. I’ve been concerned about the
development of the anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles ever since I took
this job. I would – we knew they were working on a stealth aircraft. I
think that what we’ve seen is that they may be somewhat further ahead in
the development of that aircraft than our intelligence had earlier predicted
.
* * *
"Q: Let me just clarify what you said. You said the intel on
the stealth fighter was – that they were (moving ?)ahead of that, faster
than you thought?
"SECRETARY GATES: Somewhat.
* * *
"Q: Do you believe that this stealth fighter once and for all.
There’s a lot of talk about whether or not it actually is a stealth – (
fighter ?).
"SECRETARY GATES: I think there is some question about just how
stealthy.
(c) DF-21D
"SECRETARY GATES: Well, I don’t want to talk about hypothetical
military situations. I would say that – if I understood the first
question correctly about whether the anti-ship missiles are operational at
this point – is that the question?
"MR. MORRELL: Yes.
"SECRETARY GATES: I think that the development has proceeded
fairly – I think they’re fairly far along, but whether it’s actually
reached IOC or not, I just don’t know.
My comment:
(a) IOC: Initial Operating Capability
(b) Two news reports based on this interview, neither of which is worth
reading:
(i) 裴新, 盖茨：美国采取行动抗衡中国军力发展. VOA Chinese, Jan. 9, 2011.
http://www.voanews.com/chinese/news/20110108-US-ASIA-GATES-1131
("另外，美国太平洋司令说，中国新型反舰弹道导弹已经投入现役，而盖茨却拒绝附合
他的观点")
I simply disagree with wording "投入现役." That is not what Admiral Willard
said (he used the word "operational").
* A related report does not say much, except the title.
盖茨防长访华似遇“下马威.” VOA Chinese, Jan. 9, 2011.
http://www.voanews.com/chinese/news/20110109_Gates_China_Trip-1
(ii) John Pomfret, Defense Secretary Gates: U.S. underestimated parts of
China's military modernization. Washington Post, Jan. 9, 2011.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/09 |
|
