u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 1 Nicholas Kristof是《纽约时报》的专栏作家，非常liberal，身边几个美国人都觉得
他太“普世”了。他觉得北京政府对网络的控制比他预想的要宽松。
新浪微搏地址： http://blog.sina.com.cn/jisidao
－－－－－－
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/opinion/23kristof.html
Nicholas Kristof: Banned in Beijing!
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof started a blog on Sina in order to
see how long it wold stay up after he published “counterrevolutionary”
posts supporting Liu Xiaobo and other dissidents:
On this visit, I started with blogging and with microblogging, the
Chinese version of Twitter. But, in an ominous sign, I discovered that the
Chinese authorities had tightened the rules since my last experiments. These
days, anyone starting an online account must supply an ID card number and
cellphone number. That means that the authorities can quickly track down
nettlesome commentators.
Once I got started, though, the censors were less aggressive than I had
expected, apparently relying more on intimidation than on actual censorship.
Even my microblog posts about Mr. Liu, the imprisoned dissident, went up. A
similar post mentioning the banned Falun Gong movement triggered an
automatic review, but then a moderator approved it.
(A Chinese moderator once explained to me that grunt-level censors are
mostly young computer geeks who believe in Internet freedom and try to
sabotage their responsibilities without getting fired.)
Still, there are limits. I posted a reference to the June 4, 1989,
Tiananmen massacre. It went up automatically, and then was removed by a
moderator 20 minutes later.
The challenge for the authorities is that there is just too much to
police by moderators, and automatic filters don’t work terribly well.
Chinese routinely use well-known code phrases for terms that will be
censored (June 4 might become June 2+2, or May 35). Likewise, Chinese can
usually get around the “great firewall of China” by using widely available
software, like Freegate, or by tunneling through a virtual private network. | u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 2 the censors were less aggressive than I had expected, apparently relying
more on intimidation than on actual censorship. | N*******d
发帖数: 5641 | 3 其实只要不威胁到TG的统治，官员哪有闲工夫管他干什么
to
【在 u****n 的大作中提到】
: Nicholas Kristof是《纽约时报》的专栏作家，非常liberal，身边几个美国人都觉得
: 他太“普世”了。他觉得北京政府对网络的控制比他预想的要宽松。
: 新浪微搏地址： http://blog.sina.com.cn/jisidao
: －－－－－－
: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/opinion/23kristof.html
: Nicholas Kristof: Banned in Beijing!
: New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof started a blog on Sina in order to
: see how long it wold stay up after he published “counterrevolutionary”
: posts supporting Liu Xiaobo and other dissidents:
: On this visit, I started with blogging and with microblogging, the
| d**g
发帖数: 1727 | 4 if youtube, twitter or facebook can censor posts as they are private compani
es, why shouldn't sina?
to
【在 u****n 的大作中提到】
: Nicholas Kristof是《纽约时报》的专栏作家，非常liberal，身边几个美国人都觉得
: 他太“普世”了。他觉得北京政府对网络的控制比他预想的要宽松。
: 新浪微搏地址： http://blog.sina.com.cn/jisidao
: －－－－－－
: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/opinion/23kristof.html
: Nicholas Kristof: Banned in Beijing!
: New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof started a blog on Sina in order to
: see how long it wold stay up after he published “counterrevolutionary”
: posts supporting Liu Xiaobo and other dissidents:
: On this visit, I started with blogging and with microblogging, the
| u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 5 You are right. My comments on youtube were removed many times.
compani
【在 d**g 的大作中提到】
: if youtube, twitter or facebook can censor posts as they are private compani
: es, why shouldn't sina?
:
: to
| c**e
发帖数: 5555 | 6 其实大多数时候的网站删帖就是管理员看你烦，被上头压下来的还是少数。拐着弯的骂
政府的哪个网站都一堆堆的。没有实质威胁的发泄一般也没人管你。 |
|
