l********k
发帖数: 14844 | |
y****e
发帖数: 23939 | |
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 3 关键词：银行，法律，警察，枪，pepper spray，棒子，SWAT，自杀... |
m**********n
发帖数: 27535 | 4 这是TG派5毛小将雇美国人拍的戏
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】
: 关键词：银行，法律，警察，枪，pepper spray，棒子，SWAT，自杀...
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 5 是，spaghetti和面条也不是一回事儿。
【在 y****e 的大作中提到】
: foreclose是另一嘛事吧
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 6 国内暴力强拆是很操弹。老将会说，米国人家foreclosure是合法的。米国的次贷和天
朝的炒地皮，从本质上来说都是利用住房这种生存需求来剥削p民。没有暴力执法作后
盾，血就吸不上来。 |
x*****u
发帖数: 6559 | 7 看美国人多聪明。 一个一个抓，警察慢慢的走。 tg就是土，抓老百姓还打个冲锋。
小将也有意思，tg都知道害羞，这样的视频要和谐。 小将还很自豪，认为美国爹做了
，自己就可以做了，舔美国狗的屁股不遗余力呀。 |
w*********r
发帖数: 42116 | 8 美国更合理些.
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】
: 国内暴力强拆是很操弹。老将会说，米国人家foreclosure是合法的。米国的次贷和天
: 朝的炒地皮，从本质上来说都是利用住房这种生存需求来剥削p民。没有暴力执法作后
: 盾，血就吸不上来。
|
R********n
发帖数: 5904 | 9 其实本质来说是一回事，美国是警察为了米犹财团强制撤迁，中国是为了孝敬米犹收刮
财产强制撤迁。 |
x*****u
发帖数: 6559 | 10
咋是一回事？ 美国人是为自己的利益集团，多自私呀。 中国是为了别人的利益集团，
多么无私呀。
【在 R********n 的大作中提到】
: 其实本质来说是一回事，美国是警察为了米犹财团强制撤迁，中国是为了孝敬米犹收刮
: 财产强制撤迁。
|
|
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 11 The foreclosure is that the property is no belong to you. You can not stay
in the property not belong to you. In China, the property still belong to
the owners.
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】
: 国内暴力强拆是很操弹。老将会说，米国人家foreclosure是合法的。米国的次贷和天
: 朝的炒地皮，从本质上来说都是利用住房这种生存需求来剥削p民。没有暴力执法作后
: 盾，血就吸不上来。
|
C*******d
发帖数: 15836 | 12 是这样，但是土地是狗党国的。
所以，狗党如果要地，Ｐ民就得老老实实离开。
【在 o****y 的大作中提到】
: The foreclosure is that the property is no belong to you. You can not stay
: in the property not belong to you. In China, the property still belong to
: the owners.
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 13 you are absolutely right. the end results are the following though: the
poor are driven out of their houses and
the house/land becomes the state property/bank's property. and the rules
are the same too: only when you got
money, can you protect yourself and your family.
the key difference, as you pointed out, is the legitimacy issue. in one
country, you have a piece of contract while
in the other nobody has it. in one there are written rules and the other
one hidden. it is really up to you to
decide whether there is a real difference on the more macroscopic scale.
【在 o****y 的大作中提到】
: The foreclosure is that the property is no belong to you. You can not stay
: in the property not belong to you. In China, the property still belong to
: the owners.
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 14 That proves America is not a communist country ah.
In China even worse, even the legal owners can be driven out by the
government.
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】
: you are absolutely right. the end results are the following though: the
: poor are driven out of their houses and
: the house/land becomes the state property/bank's property. and the rules
: are the same too: only when you got
: money, can you protect yourself and your family.
: the key difference, as you pointed out, is the legitimacy issue. in one
: country, you have a piece of contract while
: in the other nobody has it. in one there are written rules and the other
: one hidden. it is really up to you to
: decide whether there is a real difference on the more macroscopic scale.
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 15 that's correct. the situation is worse in china. in US, people at least
know what's going on and at what will
happen to them at what time (if they are able to read the bank statements or
can afford an accountant). whereas
in china, you can't get useful information from the TV or anywhere publicly.
the only source is the insiders. but
if one knows any, he/she would probably not be driven away in the first
place.
【在 o****y 的大作中提到】
: That proves America is not a communist country ah.
: In China even worse, even the legal owners can be driven out by the
: government.
|
d**o
发帖数: 864 | 16 oldguy是FBI的人(他承认的),勾引你用英文发文他好写报告.
别上当.
or
publicly.
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】
: that's correct. the situation is worse in china. in US, people at least
: know what's going on and at what will
: happen to them at what time (if they are able to read the bank statements or
: can afford an accountant). whereas
: in china, you can't get useful information from the TV or anywhere publicly.
: the only source is the insiders. but
: if one knows any, he/she would probably not be driven away in the first
: place.
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 17 谢谢提醒，我知道怎么回事。我用中文，勾子该报告也报告，用英文省他们翻译了。
我不指望绿卡吃饭。
【在 d**o 的大作中提到】
: oldguy是FBI的人(他承认的),勾引你用英文发文他好写报告.
: 别上当.
:
: or
: publicly.
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 18 and my point of view here is what any liberal would have. you can hear it
everywhere.
【在 d**o 的大作中提到】
: oldguy是FBI的人(他承认的),勾引你用英文发文他好写报告.
: 别上当.
:
: or
: publicly.
|
