w*l
发帖数: 2550 | 1 方舟子以前就道过歉的。
所以，请某些人收回你们的错误言论。
"But it's inappropriate not to explicitly credit you in my original posting,
and I apologize for it."
Dear Dr. Root-Bernstein,
In 1995 when I was a graduate student at MSU, I posted a short writing to an
online forum called alt.chinese.text when there was a debate about
pseudoscience among oversea Chinese students. It was an informal, casual
follow-up to a discussion thread, not an academic paper or assignment. Part
of it paraphrased the criteria of science from your article. I presented the
criteria of science as "consensus in philosophy of science" and give my own
examples to explain it. This writing was revised and formally published in
one of my books in 1999, and it cited the source as "According to the
summary by Root-Bernstein", and when the criteria were mentioned again in
another book of mine in 2007, it gave reference as "On Defining a Scientific
Theory: Creationism Considered, Robert Root-Bernstein, Science and
Creationism, Oxford University Press, 1984".(Without this reference, I don't
believe the supporters of Xiao Chuanguo, the surgeon who hired assailants
to attack me using pepper spray and hammer after I exposed his malpractice,
could track down the source and report the "plagiarism" to you and MSU
administration 16 years later. I have deleted email addresses of four Xiao's
supporters in this reply)
I never presented the criteria as my own original idea, nor did I copy your
wordings. And when it's formally published, the source had been credited and
cited. Therefore I don't think it consists of plagiarism or copyright
infringement according to the common accepted definitions with which you
disagree. But it's inappropriate not to explicitly credit you in my original
posting, and I apologize for it.
Sincerely,
Shi-min Fang | U********S
发帖数: 1896 | 2 抄没抄你的文章由我说了算，这种道歉信还真牛比。你不妨把robert斥责他的公开信也一并贴出来。
不过你提这个是给教主上眼药吧，教主东拉西扯好不容易把注意力从他抄袭导师的问题上分散开。没看到孙海峰罗永浩一提这件事教主马上落荒而逃，你偏要让他老人家白费劲不是？ | a*******g
发帖数: 2813 | 3
也一并贴出来。
题上分散开。没看到孙海峰罗永浩一提这件事教主马上落荒而逃，你偏要让他老人家白
费劲不是？
lz是来反讽方的其实
【在 U********S 的大作中提到】
: 抄没抄你的文章由我说了算，这种道歉信还真牛比。你不妨把robert斥责他的公开信也一并贴出来。
: 不过你提这个是给教主上眼药吧，教主东拉西扯好不容易把注意力从他抄袭导师的问题上分散开。没看到孙海峰罗永浩一提这件事教主马上落荒而逃，你偏要让他老人家白费劲不是？
| b*********w
发帖数: 1486 | 4 这事早就注意到了。所以别人说方舟子不会道歉的时候，我一直就在说方舟子不会向国
人道歉。
方舟子对老外，是肯道歉的。
因为在中国，他输了官司可以推说司法不独立，法官被收买。他只要把判他输的法官拉
黑就行了。这不早就给自己安排后事了吗，韩寒刚宣布告他，他马上声明：1，上海的
法庭不公正。2，即便输了官司也不道歉。
但是如果一旦在美国输了官司，他这种说法就没人信了。一辈子的把柄就留下了，污点
就抹不去了，直接给他的事业几乎是毁灭性的打击。
舟子有人格缺陷（复仇心太强），但是不是傻瓜低能儿，而是精明得很，也无赖得很。 |
|
