w*********r 发帖数: 42116 | 1 一家三口人,不舍得给孩子花钱,也没什么可折税的,就是最简单的情况。
年收入165K
401K: 33K
HEALTH/DENTAL/VISION/MEDICAL: 7.5K
W2表LINE 1: 124.5K
填写在1040-LINE 7
1040-LINE 22-36 全是空白
1040-LINE 38: 124.5K
1040-LINE 40: 36.1K (itemized deducitons) 包括 8K State income tax, 5K State
property tax, 23.1K Mortgage interest (38.5K的60%)
1040-Line 42: 11.1K 三口人的Examption
1040-Line 43: 88.4K Taxable income LINE38-LINE40-LINE42
查表得到1040-Line 44 14,344.00,只需要交纳14.3K的FEDERAL INCOME TAX。
TX FEDERAL: 14.3K
TX SOCI: 5.3 K
TX MEDI: 1.8 K
TX STATE: 8K
TX PROPERTY: 5K
TOTAL: 34.4K |
w*********r 发帖数: 42116 | 2 大部分华人都挣的比这个多,你们交多少税?
【在 w*********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一家三口人,不舍得给孩子花钱,也没什么可折税的,就是最简单的情况。 : 年收入165K : 401K: 33K : HEALTH/DENTAL/VISION/MEDICAL: 7.5K : W2表LINE 1: 124.5K : 填写在1040-LINE 7 : 1040-LINE 22-36 全是空白 : 1040-LINE 38: 124.5K : 1040-LINE 40: 36.1K (itemized deducitons) 包括 8K State income tax, 5K State : property tax, 23.1K Mortgage interest (38.5K的60%)
|
t******r 发帖数: 8600 | 3 大部分?
【在 w*********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 大部分华人都挣的比这个多,你们交多少税?
|
j****i 发帖数: 68152 | 4 啥地方,就一个人上班?俺这儿单身挣这么多过的也很紧吧 |
w*********r 发帖数: 42116 | 5 MITBBS的大部分说大部分。
【在 t******r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 大部分?
|
w*********r 发帖数: 42116 | 6 没写清楚,两人上班.
大部分美国地区。
【在 j****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 啥地方,就一个人上班?俺这儿单身挣这么多过的也很紧吧
|
j****i 发帖数: 68152 | 7 德州?
【在 w*********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 没写清楚,两人上班. : 大部分美国地区。
|
w*********r 发帖数: 42116 | 8 打听哪个州干吗?
【在 j****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 德州?
|
j****i 发帖数: 68152 | 9 知道了,伊利诺州
【在 w*********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 打听哪个州干吗?
|
w*********r 发帖数: 42116 | 10 我这个是16.5万收入的普世1040表。
【在 j****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 知道了,伊利诺州
|
|
|
g*****c 发帖数: 4378 | 11 many people here paid tax more than 16.5万
the tax is so heavy in US |
s***q 发帖数: 10585 | 12 家庭收入16万5,交税34.4K,这还算是w2一族中少的了
当然普屎派可以狡辩:“你们一年挣16.5W,就是百分之一了啦。
你多交税也是应该的,不然那些downtown的黑人的福利从哪儿来?
霉国是普屎制度,杀富济贫”
State
【在 w*********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一家三口人,不舍得给孩子花钱,也没什么可折税的,就是最简单的情况。 : 年收入165K : 401K: 33K : HEALTH/DENTAL/VISION/MEDICAL: 7.5K : W2表LINE 1: 124.5K : 填写在1040-LINE 7 : 1040-LINE 22-36 全是空白 : 1040-LINE 38: 124.5K : 1040-LINE 40: 36.1K (itemized deducitons) 包括 8K State income tax, 5K State : property tax, 23.1K Mortgage interest (38.5K的60%)
|
s***q 发帖数: 10585 | 13 国内普适纷纷表示:这个数字是霉国富人的收入 ,top 1%!
见AQQ贴子在天涯的回复
【在 j****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 啥地方,就一个人上班?俺这儿单身挣这么多过的也很紧吧
|
k******a 发帖数: 2436 | 14 1%怎么也得250k吧
【在 s***q 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 国内普适纷纷表示:这个数字是霉国富人的收入 ,top 1%! : 见AQQ贴子在天涯的回复
|
s***q 发帖数: 10585 | 15 所以说国内普屎无知+脑残啊
【在 k******a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 1%怎么也得250k吧
|
m***6 发帖数: 8479 | 16 德州没有该死的州税
【在 j****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 德州?
|
k******a 发帖数: 2436 | 17 In year 2009, top 1% household income = $343k
in 2007 it was $424k
Note this is AGI, meaning it is after deducting 401k savings
http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/20/news/economy/occupy_wall_street
【在 k******a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 1%怎么也得250k吧
|
l********k 发帖数: 14844 | 18 我老本来还想呢,怎么变少了?咋统计的?瞥到下面赫然写着cnn, ows,豁然开朗...
【在 k******a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : In year 2009, top 1% household income = $343k : in 2007 it was $424k : Note this is AGI, meaning it is after deducting 401k savings : http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/20/news/economy/occupy_wall_street
|
k******a 发帖数: 2436 | 19 data is from IRS. Top 5% AGI = 154K, top 10% AGI = 121K.
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我老本来还想呢,怎么变少了?咋统计的?瞥到下面赫然写着cnn, ows,豁然开朗...
|
l********k 发帖数: 14844 | 20 怎么不统计top 10%呢?绝对降得更多。你会说,当然啊,10%又不都是富人。我跟你说
,cnn就在打这个马虎眼。现在富人/穷人分界线不在1%,而在0.1%。1%中位收入下降是
好事?坏事?你自己想想吧。
As of 2005, there were approximately 146,000 (0.1%) households with incomes
exceeding $1,500,000, while the top 0.01% or 11,000 households had incomes
exceeding $5,500,000. The 400 highest tax payers in the nation had gross
annual household incomes exceeding $87,000,000. Household incomes for this
group have risen more dramatically than for any other. As a result the gap
between those who make less than one and half million dollars annually (99.9
% of households) and those who make more (0.1%) has been steadily increasing
, prompting The New York Times to proclaim that the "Richest Are Leaving
Even the Rich Far Behind." Indeed the income disparities within the top 1.5%
are quite drastic. While households in the top 1.5% of households had
incomes exceeding $250,000, 443% above the national median, their incomes
were still 2200% lower than those of the top .01% of households. One can
therefore conclude that almost any household, even those with incomes of $
250,000 annually are poor when compared to the top .1%, who in turn are poor
compared to the top 0.000267%, the top 400 taxpaying households.
【在 k******a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : data is from IRS. Top 5% AGI = 154K, top 10% AGI = 121K.
|
|
|
g*****c 发帖数: 4378 | 21 good point.
nowadays it's not so hard to get into 1%
but you are still as poor as the 99% relatively comparing to 0.01%
incomes
.9
increasing
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 怎么不统计top 10%呢?绝对降得更多。你会说,当然啊,10%又不都是富人。我跟你说 : ,cnn就在打这个马虎眼。现在富人/穷人分界线不在1%,而在0.1%。1%中位收入下降是 : 好事?坏事?你自己想想吧。 : As of 2005, there were approximately 146,000 (0.1%) households with incomes : exceeding $1,500,000, while the top 0.01% or 11,000 households had incomes : exceeding $5,500,000. The 400 highest tax payers in the nation had gross : annual household incomes exceeding $87,000,000. Household incomes for this : group have risen more dramatically than for any other. As a result the gap : between those who make less than one and half million dollars annually (99.9 : % of households) and those who make more (0.1%) has been steadily increasing
|
l********k 发帖数: 14844 | 22 障眼法就在于,十年二十年前,挣个几十万确实就是富人了。现在很多人挣到300k+也
觉得自己挺了不起。可问题是现在的几十万和十年前的几十万可不是一个概念。
另一点,更隐蔽的,就是你说的。终于“挤进”1%,正准备得意呢,结果发现不是自己
排位提高了,而是自己前面那0.9%被更顶上的0.1%抛弃,导致自己被“反向追赶”了,
还是一样穷。
【在 g*****c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : good point. : nowadays it's not so hard to get into 1% : but you are still as poor as the 99% relatively comparing to 0.01% : : incomes : .9 : increasing
|
k*********t 发帖数: 2999 | 23 300K在湾区也不过挤小黑屋,确实没啥了不起的。呵呵
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 障眼法就在于,十年二十年前,挣个几十万确实就是富人了。现在很多人挣到300k+也 : 觉得自己挺了不起。可问题是现在的几十万和十年前的几十万可不是一个概念。 : 另一点,更隐蔽的,就是你说的。终于“挤进”1%,正准备得意呢,结果发现不是自己 : 排位提高了,而是自己前面那0.9%被更顶上的0.1%抛弃,导致自己被“反向追赶”了, : 还是一样穷。
|
l********k 发帖数: 14844 | 24 是啊,所以纠结几个%,根本没什么意义。电视宣传有钱人也穷,大家别眼红,统统是
在上麻药。明摆着中产电池的生活质量越来越不行,大佬们一统天下势不可挡嘛。
【在 k*********t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 300K在湾区也不过挤小黑屋,确实没啥了不起的。呵呵
|
k*********t 发帖数: 2999 | 25 在本地长大的老美同事最近常来我办公室忆甜思苦,感慨这些年来中产生活的变化和美
好前景,很为他孩子的将来担忧。呵呵
【在 l********k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 是啊,所以纠结几个%,根本没什么意义。电视宣传有钱人也穷,大家别眼红,统统是 : 在上麻药。明摆着中产电池的生活质量越来越不行,大佬们一统天下势不可挡嘛。
|
c*****r 发帖数: 8227 | 26 美国人口普查局(US Census Bureau)公布的最新统计数据,截止2010
大家对号入座。
"Household" (户)Income:
Total household number: 118,682,000
Top 5 percent household number: 5,933,000
Top 5 percent household Lower limit: $180,812
"Family" (家庭)Income:
Total family number: 78,633,000
Top 5 percent family number: 3,932,000
Top 5 percent family Lower limit: $200,354
"Person" (个人)Income (15 Years Old and Over):
Total: 243,955,000
Total with Income: 211,492,000
People earn $100,000 and over: 13,970,000 (6.6%)
People earn $200,000 and over: 2,520,000 (1.2%)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Household Net Worth (净资产), 2004数据
Median: $79,800
Mean: $270,236
Percent Distribution of Household Net Worth:
$50,000 to $99,999:11.6%
$100,000 to $249,999:19.6%
$250,000 to $499,999:13.4%
$500,000 or over:12.8% |
w*****g 发帖数: 1415 | 27 so do my co-workers.
【在 k*********t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 在本地长大的老美同事最近常来我办公室忆甜思苦,感慨这些年来中产生活的变化和美 : 好前景,很为他孩子的将来担忧。呵呵
|