x********i
发帖数: 905 | 1 http://avanworld.blog.163.com/blog/static/598739562009671036131
美国使用RBGH的奶农和奶粉...
ZT:美国使用RBGH的奶农比例在95%以上，美国产的奶粉也挺毒的
转贴：其实中国毒奶远比不上美国的毒奶!
其实中国毒奶和美国的毒奶比起来，算是小朋友了！事实表明中国体制还是保护消费者
的，这点美国差的很远！
美国奶制品有没有中国的毒奶门事件呢？A爷告述大家，其实是有的，而且还非常的严
重，这就是有名的RBGH，重组牛用生长激素事件。
RBGH是一种基因重组的牛用生长激素，它的用处和中国的*不一样，但效果和目的是相
同的,后者是增加蛋白质检验通过率，前者则是生物药用人为刺激奶牛增产激素。
一般来说，使用RBGH的奶牛产量可以达到增产15-20%，是有大利可以图的。在这里有个
特别要说明的是，在目前整个西方工业国家，包含中国，都明确禁止使用RBGH注射性口。
而这在美国使用RBGH的奶农比例在95%以上。美国FDA在公众压力下不得不承认这种生物
工程基因的奶牛注射rBGH疗法，会使奶牛获得增加患乳房感染（乳腺炎）的机会，严重
的生殖问题，消化系统紊乱，脚和腿部的疾病，和持久性溃疡和割伤。 人类服用RBGH
注射过的奶牛和食用此的肉制品（美国40%的牛肉制品来之于奶牛）有很大的可能性获
得乳腺炎乳腺炎结肠癌和前列腺癌.
证据已表明服用此种牛奶，牛奶本身含有比常规牛奶更高的脓液，细菌和抗生素，一般
奶牛的寿命是15-20年，而注射了RBGH的奶牛寿命平均缩短了5-10年，有的在注射后2年
里就死去了。
可见，美国的牛奶和中国的结石奶相比，在威害性上，是有过之而无不及的。区别在于
中国人水平低一点，用化学品直接填加，反应立竿见影。美国用的是高科技，基因存积
很可能在几代后才会有所表现。
美国为啥不禁止RBGH的运用？FDA甚至到现在都没有办法明确地方立法，既:最少贴上标
识，让消费者知道他们买的是注射过RBGH的奶制品,至少可以选择是否使用.
原因很简单，美国奶制品背后的财团，和奶制品分销商，奶工的工会，和两院游说的力
量强大，所以美国就算明确知道，这种注射是危害性的，但仍然拒绝禁止运行。
而所凭的理由可笑幼稚的可爱，因为财团的研究室，和FDA在长达数年的对比试验中，
没有发现RBGH对人体明显的毒害。而且本身也没有标志性的受害者。 所以无需禁止!
现在就算智力是70以下的人都知道，基因添加品，重组基因的产品，要看出其的病理影
响，短短几年的对比试验是远远不够的。很多危害很可能长大几十年之后，才会表露出
来。这是连小朋友也懂的道理。事实上在科学界早有共识，毒素的叠加是累积性的，不
是不报，只是时侯没到。
任何一个正常的人，如果让他们知道他们喝的奶牛被注射了基因重组的药物，发明他的
人根本就没IDEA以后会发生啥，被注射的奶牛出现癌变的机会上升15个百分点，而没有
禁止的原因，仅仅是因为FDA在数年对比试验中没有发现对人体的明显影响。那我会很
有性趣知道他们会不会一口喝下。
RBGH只是美国财团院外游说使美国ZF对抗民意的一个小例子。
美国卖的减肥可乐是另一个好榜样，大部分美国减肥可乐中都含有aspartame,这东西简
单的说，直接的产物就是，多发性神经硬化症Multiple Sclerosis（Multiple
Sclerosis），而且其在人体内遇着凝乳酪蛋白酵素，或是於摄氏三十度以上时，即会
分解出甲醇，这个是很难被人所代谢并排出体外的。
喝此种饮品，就是慢性中毒，代糖在美国学术界有个很有趣的现象。既：FDA所代表的
官方机构，总是客意降低代糖等人工合成品对人体的潜在危害性。而独立的大学，研究
室却一直认为ZF重视不够，其的危害性比想象的高很多！。
如果我们考虑到FDA官员与业界间之利益关系，以及美国的院外游说的力量，那我们是
否该想想那些独立性更强的大学研究院和官僚之间，谁的话更可信一点？
不过这里有个很好的答案，因为代糖在吸收过程中可能引起人的短暂制盲，所以美国飞
行俱乐部，和飞行员工会等组织呼吁，飞行员在飞行前千万不要暴饮代糖饮料。
到这里，在身处美国的A爷的教导之下，大家是否知道了些许以前不知道的真象？
现在美国的超市里出现一个新的风气，叫作ORGANIC FOOD之风，也就是有机食品之风，
既然政府拒绝在巨大的院外财团，（那些花费了巨资而渴望在基因，化学疗法上收回投
资，并且在高科技的基因计术之间和政府利益千丝万缕的财团）面前让步。那民众只好
接受这点，消极应对。既然你不肯帖出你是基因过的食品那我就帖出我是天然的有机食
品。
不过这里有一点要注意，美国的有机食品，既ORGANIC FOOD的价格可比一般的贵的多。
你要不想吃被打了基因针，用了代糖，和人工兽药，基因合成平的食品，那也很好办。
多拿出美元，有的是两倍的价格，就OK了。搜了点英文的大家看
http://www.awionline.org/farm/rbgh-s99.htm
rBGH Ruled Unsafe for Canadian and European People and Cows
Canada and the European Union have banned the use of Bovine Recombinant
Growth Hormone (rBGH), citing its toxicity to both cows and humans, but the
US Food and Drug Administration approved rBGH use for US dairy cows.
rBGH a genetically engineered synthetic hormone, mimics a naturally
occurring hormone released when a cow is pregnant, which allows the cow to
produce milk for her calf. When rBGH is injected into a cow, nature runs
wild, causing the cow's milk output to increase. Nutritional energy that is
supposed to sustain the entire cow becomes almost entirely dedicated to milk
production. Vital nutrients are leached from other parts of her body,
causing painful udder infections and cri****ing lameness. In addition, rBGH
injected cows are much more likely to suffer infertility and
gastrointestinal disorders. Because rBGH use increases the incidence of
disease a rBGH-injected cow requires greater amounts of antibiotics than an
rBGH-free cow. Increased antibiotic usage may lead to resistance to
antimicrobials, having dire consequences for the health of both humans and
cows.
After more than nine years of study that took into account the findings of
two independent advisory panels, Health Canada (the FDA's Canadian
counterpart) made the decision to ban the hormone, citing greatly increased
health risks to cows and potential health risks for humans exposed to rBGH.
Canadian researchers reported that "long-term toxicology studies to
ascertain human safety" must be conducted, as their research indicated that
rBGH may cause "sterility, infertility, birth defects, cancer and
immunological derangements" in humans. Other recent studies, as reported in
the Journals Science (1/23/98) and The Lancet (5/9/98) have linked IGF-I (
Insulin-like Growth Factor), high levels of which are present in milk
produced with rBGH, to much increased incidence of prostate and breast
cancer.
The European Union has enacted an rBGH moratorium, due to expire in 2000,
based on European studies that concurred with Health Canada's findings. In
addition, a recent European Commission on Consumer Health and Protection
study concluded that rBGH should not be used in dairy cows, as its use se***
*sly compromises a cow's health and well-being.
Why the US needs to increase milk production is puzzling. Every year since
the mid-1950s, the US has produced far more milk than its citizens can
consume. According to the Ecologist (vol. 28, no. 5), since 1980 the US
government has spent a whopping 18 billion dollars sopping up America's milk
surplus in order to prevent milk prices from plummeting.
How and why approval of rBGH occurred and is being upheld, seems not so much
a question answered by sound science or interest in the public's welfare,
but by corporate patronage. If rBGH's approval were to be rescinded, the
Monsanto corporation stands to lose $300 to $500 million a year in sales of
its rBGH product, Posilac. Upper echelons of Monsanto and FDA management are
constantly interchanged. Many of Monsanto's top brass were once employed by
the FDA, and vice versa. For example, Margaret Miller, the FDA's Director
of Food Safety, is now "reviewing" her own rBGH research done while she was
a Monsanto employee. Monsanto attorney Michael Taylor was hired by the FDA
to fast-track rBGH through the approval process.
In order to approve the growth hormone, the FDA violated its own guidelines
on several occasions. According to FDA literature, approval of a drug "
requires pharmaceutical companies to submit all studies they conducted [and]
all the raw data form the basis of the approval of the product...". The FDA
never reviewed all of Monsanto's data, disregarded the Canadian ban
decision, and approved rBGH based solely on information presented in
Monsanto's own project summary.
The FDA website states that the "elimination of violative residues in meat
and milk" is of utmost importance. By ignoring warnings from both Europe and
Canada, the FDA endangers the well-being of Americans and their dairy cows.
How You Can Be rBGH-Free
Betsy Lydon, consumer representative on the National Organic Standards Board
and Program Director at Mothers & Others, an organization educating
consumers about safe and ecologically sustainable buying choices, has a few
simple, yet effective, recommendations to avoid rBGH-tainted products.
Read the label. If your milk carton doesn't say organic or rBGH-free on the
label, then the milk inside isn't rBGH free. At a conventional milk
processing plant, milk is collected from individual dairies and then taken
to a centralized "creamery" where milk front rBGH-injected cows is mixed
with milk produced without the synthetic growth hormone, tainting the entire
batch of milk. All products certified organic are labeled as such and do
not contain milk produced from rBGH injected cows. Although an organic label
is the only guarantee that a dairy item is rBGH-free, a few larger
companies, such as Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream and Stonyfield Farms Yogurt
have long standing policies of only buying milk from dairies that pledge not
to ruse rBGH. Labels on their product certify their foods as rBGH-free.
Buy local or buy imported. Many small, producer-owned dairy cooperatives do
not use growth hormones in their cows, so check around home for a good local
dairy that certifies its milk as rBGH-free. Because rBGH is banned in
Canada and the European Union, dairy products imported from either place do
not contain the growth hormone.
_______________________________________________________
Left: This dairy cow was found covered in mud and nearly starved when she
was rescued from a North Carolina dairy. She now leads a rBGH-free life at
The Humane Farming Association's Suwanna Ranch – a farm animal refuge. | p****m
发帖数: 204 | 2 美国食品里肯定有什么大问题，看看青少年的体型就知道
【在 x********i 的大作中提到】
: http://avanworld.blog.163.com/blog/static/598739562009671036131
: 美国使用RBGH的奶农和奶粉...
: ZT:美国使用RBGH的奶农比例在95%以上，美国产的奶粉也挺毒的
: 转贴：其实中国毒奶远比不上美国的毒奶!
: 其实中国毒奶和美国的毒奶比起来，算是小朋友了！事实表明中国体制还是保护消费者
: 的，这点美国差的很远！
: 美国奶制品有没有中国的毒奶门事件呢？A爷告述大家，其实是有的，而且还非常的严
: 重，这就是有名的RBGH，重组牛用生长激素事件。
: RBGH是一种基因重组的牛用生长激素，它的用处和中国的*不一样，但效果和目的是相
: 同的,后者是增加蛋白质检验通过率，前者则是生物药用人为刺激奶牛增产激素。
| l**t
发帖数: 6971 | 3
又一个没来过美国的五毛。。。
没有用rBGH的牛奶都清清楚楚的标注着呢。Starbucks做咖啡的牛奶也都是没有rBGH的
。
【在 x********i 的大作中提到】
: http://avanworld.blog.163.com/blog/static/598739562009671036131
: 美国使用RBGH的奶农和奶粉...
: ZT:美国使用RBGH的奶农比例在95%以上，美国产的奶粉也挺毒的
: 转贴：其实中国毒奶远比不上美国的毒奶!
: 其实中国毒奶和美国的毒奶比起来，算是小朋友了！事实表明中国体制还是保护消费者
: 的，这点美国差的很远！
: 美国奶制品有没有中国的毒奶门事件呢？A爷告述大家，其实是有的，而且还非常的严
: 重，这就是有名的RBGH，重组牛用生长激素事件。
: RBGH是一种基因重组的牛用生长激素，它的用处和中国的*不一样，但效果和目的是相
: 同的,后者是增加蛋白质检验通过率，前者则是生物药用人为刺激奶牛增产激素。
|
|
