y*******o
发帖数: 6632 | 1 sw发给翰林的邮件
“媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊。”
为什么sw要强调”我说的是朱令血中的铊“，是为了和她们投入的铊区别开来
这也正好能解释为什么她们如此纠结一次还是两次投毒，如此纠结铊的致死量的问题
但究竟谁是凶手，很难说
警察当年居然没有逐个闻讯寝室人员，实在是失职
连金亚都没问！
上下文是这样的：
李问孙
朱令血中的铊是多少了？我来看看是否是中毒极限或者致死量
孙回答：
媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊
有点值得怀疑，但是也可能只是只是强调对孙的回答。
这个案子无解了，与其抓真凶，不如帮朱令
希望凶手放下屠刀立地成佛吧
而且实际上当孙维要求金亚等站出来作证的时候
没有人真正答应她去面对媒体，比如金亚说面对警察可以，面对媒体有疑虑。
所以她们这个并不像网民说的铁板一块 |
x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 2
1. It shows serious flaw in police work, so you are not likely to find any
useful clues in the case file even if it's opened.
2. Since it's such flawed police work, those comments that say police were
confident about breaking the case case stop now. You can't expect them to
find the right person unless they lucked out and stumbled upon him/her.
3. SW's interest in finding out if it's possible a single poisoning event
can create the same symptoms is a natural response when someone is accused
of poisoning another person twice.
4. “媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊。” The second part could
very well just to make clear what the media was saying. You are reading so
much from it only because you came in with the prejudice that she was the
one who poisoned Zhu. Otherwise, it's really a very normal sentence.
【在 y*******o 的大作中提到】
: sw发给翰林的邮件
: “媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊。”
: 为什么sw要强调”我说的是朱令血中的铊“，是为了和她们投入的铊区别开来
: 这也正好能解释为什么她们如此纠结一次还是两次投毒，如此纠结铊的致死量的问题
: 但究竟谁是凶手，很难说
: 警察当年居然没有逐个闻讯寝室人员，实在是失职
: 连金亚都没问！
: 上下文是这样的：
: 李问孙
: 朱令血中的铊是多少了？我来看看是否是中毒极限或者致死量
|
k*******2
发帖数: 1429 | 3 "3. SW's interest in finding out if it's possible a single poisoning event
can create the same symptoms is a natural response when someone is accused
of poisoning another person twice."
This is not true, nobody will response like SW after such an accusation.
could
so
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 1. It shows serious flaw in police work, so you are not likely to find any
: useful clues in the case file even if it's opened.
: 2. Since it's such flawed police work, those comments that say police were
: confident about breaking the case case stop now. You can't expect them to
: find the right person unless they lucked out and stumbled upon him/her.
: 3. SW's interest in finding out if it's possible a single poisoning event
: can create the same symptoms is a natural response when someone is accused
: of poisoning another person twice.
: 4. “媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊。” The second part could
|
y*******o
发帖数: 6632 | 4 所有的信重读了三遍，
发现你的解释也很适用
实际上有些是笔误，比如更圆滑一点的说法，如果改成更圆润一点的说法就不错了
比如孙维要求作证，如果你记得就说，不记得就算了。
媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊， 是为了回答李翰林的问题， 所以
根本没有直接证据
could
so
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 1. It shows serious flaw in police work, so you are not likely to find any
: useful clues in the case file even if it's opened.
: 2. Since it's such flawed police work, those comments that say police were
: confident about breaking the case case stop now. You can't expect them to
: find the right person unless they lucked out and stumbled upon him/her.
: 3. SW's interest in finding out if it's possible a single poisoning event
: can create the same symptoms is a natural response when someone is accused
: of poisoning another person twice.
: 4. “媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊。” The second part could
|
k*******2
发帖数: 1429 | 5 "1. It shows serious flaw in police work, so you are not likely to find any
useful clues in the case file even if it's opened."
This is not true. Even if there is flaw or flaws i the police work. It does
not necessarily mean that everything in the case investigation is useless.
could
so
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 1. It shows serious flaw in police work, so you are not likely to find any
: useful clues in the case file even if it's opened.
: 2. Since it's such flawed police work, those comments that say police were
: confident about breaking the case case stop now. You can't expect them to
: find the right person unless they lucked out and stumbled upon him/her.
: 3. SW's interest in finding out if it's possible a single poisoning event
: can create the same symptoms is a natural response when someone is accused
: of poisoning another person twice.
: 4. “媒体说铊的剂量是致命的，我说的是朱令血中的铊。” The second part could
|
x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 6
Now you are just talking out of your ass.
"Nobody will response like...". How do you know that? You can only speak
for yourself. I would certainly find anything and everything that could
poke holes in the accusation leveled against me.
【在 k*******2 的大作中提到】
: "3. SW's interest in finding out if it's possible a single poisoning event
: can create the same symptoms is a natural response when someone is accused
: of poisoning another person twice."
: This is not true, nobody will response like SW after such an accusation.
:
: could
: so
|
