w******y
发帖数: 27 | 1 Ukraine crisis: Ignore Western hypocrisy, Putin will do what he wants
By Simon Tisdall, Special to CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/07/opinion/putin-western-hypocro
Editor's note: Simon Tisdall is assistant editor and foreign affairs
columnist of the Guardian. He was previously foreign editor of the Guardian
and the Observer and served as White House corespondent and U.S. editor in
Washington D.C. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely his.
(CNN) -- All the self-righteous huffing and puffing in Washington over
Ukraine jars on European and especially Russian ears after the multiple U.S.
-led invasions and interventions in other people's countries of recent years
. It's difficult to say what is more astonishing: the double standards
exhibited by the White House, or the apparent total lack of self-awareness
of U.S. officials.
Secretary of State John Kerry risked utter ridicule when he declared it
unacceptable to invade another country on a "completely trumped-up pretext,"
or just because you don't like its current leadership. Iraq in 2003 springs
instantly to mind. This is exactly what George W. Bush and Tony Blair did
when they "trumped up" the supposed threat posed by the hated Saddam Hussein
's fabled weapons of mass destruction.
Like Saddam, the Taliban leadership in place in Afghanistan in 2001 was
deeply objectionable. But instead of just going after Osama bin Laden and
his al Qaeda training camps after the 9/11 attacks, Bush (again abetted by
Blair) opted for full-scale regime change. The lamentable consequences of
that decision are still being felt 13 years later, not least by Afghan
civilians who have been dying in ever greater numbers as the final Nato
withdrawal approaches.
U.S. President Barack Obama, a former law professor who should know better,
has charged Vladimir Putin, his Russian counterpart, with violating Ukraine'
s sovereignty and territorial integrity, in breach of international law.
But it is Obama, following in Bush's footsteps, who has repeatedly and
cynically flouted international law by launching or backing myriad armed
attacks on foreign soil, in Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan to name a few
, without U.N. security council authorization. It is Obama's administration
which continues to undermine international law by refusing to join or
recognize the International Criminal Court, the most important instrument of
international justice to have been developed since 1945.
And it is Obama's State Department, principally in the person of Assistant
Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, that fatally overplayed its hand in the
run-up to last month's second Ukraine revolution. Nuland's infamous "f**k
the EU" comment revealed the extent to which Washington was recklessly
maneuvering to undermine Ukraine's elected pro-Russian president, Viktor
Yanukovych, by backing the Kiev street protesters' demands.
The EU had wanted to take things more gradually, for fear of provoking the
very Russian reaction to which the U.S. now so strongly objects. When the
foreign ministers of Germany, France and Poland, acting for the EU,
negotiated a compromise agreement on February 22 that envisaged early
elections, the crisis appeared to have been defused. Russia did not like the
deal, but seemed ready to go along.
But within 24 hours, the opposition had torn up the agreement. It forced
Yanukovych from power and sacked the government. To alarm in Moscow, where
nightmarish World War II memories linger, Ukrainian neo-fascists were among
those who seized control. They are now part of the new government in Kiev.
The U.S. almost immediately gave its blessing to what the Kremlin later
described as a "coup d'etat" while the EU, knowing this was what Washington
wanted, just looked on. Little wonder the Russians were furious at what they
saw as a western double cross.
Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, reflected these worries when he
voiced "most serious concern" over Ukraine in phone calls to the French,
German and Polish foreign ministers. "The opposition not only has failed to
fulfil a single one of its obligations but is already presenting new demands
all the time, following the lead of armed extremists and pogromists whose
actions pose a direct threat to Ukraine's sovereignty and constitutional
order,'' Lavrov said. But it was already too late.
Obama and Kerry seem to have calmed down a little since the crisis first
broke. The self-righteous hyperbole about international rights is less
evident, though it has not disappeared entirely. Obama has heard the many
voices in the U.S. and beyond terming this the worst east-west crisis since
the end of the Cold War -- and as the biggest foreign test of his presidency.
So now he's doing what he does best: talking. In his latest phone call to
Putin, on Thursday this week, Obama put forward a plan to resolve the stand-
off diplomatically. It includes direct talks between Moscow and Kiev, the
return of Russian troops to their bases, and the deployment of international
observers to ensure the rights of all ethnic groups, including Crimean
Russians, are respected.
But don't hold your breath. Putin is in no hurry to back off or back down.
He has his tail up after a fortnight in which he exposed the hypocrisy and
hollowness of much of western policy and politicians. His behavior,
especially in Crimea, has been dangerous, wrong-headed and irresponsible in
the extreme. In many ways, Putin is an unredeemed Cold War throwback. He is
definitely not the sort of chap one would invite round for dinner, as a
former British diplomat commented. The crisis could still explode in his and
everyone else's face. But it was not unprovoked.
And the Russian leader has an eye for precedent. Similar battles over so-
called "frozen conflicts" and the rights of isolated ethnic groups loom
elsewhere on Russia's periphery, in Georgia, Moldova, Armenia, Nagorno-
Karabakh, and maybe Belarus and the Baltic states too. Putin is putting down
a marker, even as he plays Obama and Kerry for fools.
Whatever they think in Washington, and whatever the financial markets say,
it's working for him personally. Latest opinion polls in Russia show Putin's
popularity soaring. One of these days western leaders will drop the pious
cant, learn to stop under-estimating him, and recognize Russia's leader-for-
life as the canny, very dangerous, utterly unscrupulous opponent he is. | f*********g
发帖数: 1637 | 2 这样大体公允的文章，其观点并非首创。欧美主流媒体之外及世界公众，只要他们不是
偏执狂，都知道这些基本事实。但是欧美主流媒体完全无视，所以CNN发此文，值得玩
味。也许他们想树立一个独立媒体的形象？ | b***y
发帖数: 14281 | 3 因为这次知道要横不过去了，所以先找好台阶，免得到时候被打脸打得太响。
【在 f*********g 的大作中提到】
: 这样大体公允的文章，其观点并非首创。欧美主流媒体之外及世界公众，只要他们不是
: 偏执狂，都知道这些基本事实。但是欧美主流媒体完全无视，所以CNN发此文，值得玩
: 味。也许他们想树立一个独立媒体的形象？
| s*******n
发帖数: 10426 | 4 TG什么时候能让媒体发些“大体公允”“基本事实”的文章？
【在 f*********g 的大作中提到】
: 这样大体公允的文章，其观点并非首创。欧美主流媒体之外及世界公众，只要他们不是
: 偏执狂，都知道这些基本事实。但是欧美主流媒体完全无视，所以CNN发此文，值得玩
: 味。也许他们想树立一个独立媒体的形象？
| l*********u
发帖数: 19053 | 5 re :)
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: 因为这次知道要横不过去了，所以先找好台阶，免得到时候被打脸打得太响。
|
|
