d**z
发帖数: 3577 | 1 我早说了，后清国欺内媚外，举世皆知。
洋人鄙视，但不说而已，反正对洋人有利。
并且早已变成世界各国和各民族的共识。
现在剑桥大学还有研究成果，并且有论文。
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/americans-show-unethical-leaning-
其实已经很客气了，没直说举国愚蠢犯贱。
阿Q后清还爱演戏装阔，其实早已是徒然。
后清是最欺内，媚外犯贱，反理性的国家。
世界各国是欺外媚内，后清国则是欺内媚外。
AMERICANS SHOW "UNETHICAL" LEANING WHEN SEALING DEALS WITH CHINA
Americans are more likely to use unethical tactics in business negotiations
with Chinese than with other Americans, while Chinese are more likely to be
unethical when dealing with their fellow countrymen, according to research.
A study, by the Cambridge Judge Business School in collaboration with US and
Chinese academics, looked at the propensity of Americans and Chinese to use
"ethically questionable" negotiating strategies, such as lying, spying or
trying to get their counterparty fired.
"American participants were significantly more likely to use ethically
questionable negotiation tactics in inter-cultural negotiations with Chinese
counterparts than in intra-cultural negotiations with American counterparts
," the study found. "By contrast, Chinese participants were marginally less
likely to use such tactics in inter-cultural negotiations with American
counterparts than in intra-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts."
One possible explanation for this imbalance is the perceived likelihood that
the other side in a negotiation will themselves use unethical tactics. In
other words, both American and Chinese businesspeople perceive Chinese
counterparties as less scrupulous.
The study provided some evidence to support this belief. It found Chinese
negotiators were significantly more willing to use unethical tactics in
business negotiations, regardless of who they negotiated with, than
Americans were.
Participants were asked, on a scale of one to seven, their likelihood of
using 16 ethically questionable negotiation strategies.
These included false promises, misrepresentation to strengthen their
position, inappropriate information-gathering about the counterparty's
negotiating position, attacking an opponent's network, and "traditional"
competitive bargaining such as inflated opening demands.
The study then calculated the likelihood that a group would use ethically
questionable negotiating tactics.
On a scale of one to seven, with seven being the least ethical, American
participants had a mean score of 3.00 when dealing with Chinese counterparts
and 2.75 when dealing with American counterparts.
Meanwhile, Chinese participants had a higher score of 3.92 when dealing with
Americans and 4.06 when dealing with Chinese counterparts.
Steven Feldman, a visiting professor at the Guanghua School of Management at
Peking University who specialises in ethical and cultural differences
between the US and China, said researchers needed to be cautious about
making generalisations in terms of national culture.
That is because ethical business behaviour in China can vary considerably
based on regional differences and is also in constant flux.
"In regard to the Chinese inclination to treat fellow Chinese and Americans
ethically similarly, certainly this is not true historically - field studies
from the 1990s and early 2000s show the Chinese highly inclined to take
advantage of westerners," Professor Feldman said. "It is an interesting
question whether this has changed as the Chinese economy has grown and
Chinese executives have become more experienced. Perhaps this study suggests
they have."
According to the research, the unethical behaviour most likely to be used by
Americans related to dubious information-gathering and false promises.
Chinese participants were most likely to make false promises and "attack
their opponent's network" by, for instance, trying to get their counterparty
fired so a new person would take their place.
"Our current analysis suggests that people may change their use of ethically
questionable tactics when they negotiate with someone from a different
country," the study said. "In negotiations, people adopt different models of
what is ethically acceptable for themselves in intra-cultural versus inter-
cultural situations."
Additional Reporting by Christian Shepherd
Copyright © 2015 The Financial Times Limited. Please don't cut and
paste FT.com articles and redistribute by email or post to the web. | G****e
发帖数: 1912 | 2 其实正常，在国外坑老中的大多就是老中。
只有廊五小将成天在这鼓吹自己都不信的理论。在美国，防老中，其次防烙印。欧洲的
也有小心眼。反倒是版上成天骂的老美老黑甚而老穆人品都比Chink可靠多了。
【在 d**z 的大作中提到】
: 我早说了，后清国欺内媚外，举世皆知。
: 洋人鄙视，但不说而已，反正对洋人有利。
: 并且早已变成世界各国和各民族的共识。
: 现在剑桥大学还有研究成果，并且有论文。
: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/americans-show-unethical-leaning-
: 其实已经很客气了，没直说举国愚蠢犯贱。
: 阿Q后清还爱演戏装阔，其实早已是徒然。
: 后清是最欺内，媚外犯贱，反理性的国家。
: 世界各国是欺外媚内，后清国则是欺内媚外。
: AMERICANS SHOW "UNETHICAL" LEANING WHEN SEALING DEALS WITH CHINA
| d**z
发帖数: 3577 | 3 老中加入这研究也再次证明后清学者的愚蠢。
人家就是要后清学者参与，好夸大抹黑后清国。
其实这篇文章的言外之意是后清国民最狡诈。
而最狡诈的盗魔经信徒Feldman更不忘强调这点。
并且还暗示后清国民的经济进步源于欺骗做假。 | G****e
发帖数: 1912 | 4 "In regard to the Chinese inclination to treat fellow Chinese and Americans
ethically similarly, certainly this is not true historically - field studies
from the 1990s and early 2000s show the Chinese highly inclined to take
advantage of westerners," Professor Feldman said. "It is an interesting
question whether this has changed as the Chinese economy has grown and
Chinese executives have become more experienced. Perhaps this study suggests
they have." | w*********r
发帖数: 42116 | 5 坑反对自己的人有什么错误吗？
【在 G****e 的大作中提到】
: 其实正常，在国外坑老中的大多就是老中。
: 只有廊五小将成天在这鼓吹自己都不信的理论。在美国，防老中，其次防烙印。欧洲的
: 也有小心眼。反倒是版上成天骂的老美老黑甚而老穆人品都比Chink可靠多了。
| d**z
发帖数: 3577 | 6
Americans
studies
suggests
----------------------------
疣叫兽Feldman上面的说法不是颠倒是非么？
说华人现在如此，但过去比现在更加狡诈。
还说貌似进步了，言下之意是越过去越更坏。
被西方和前清剥削奴役插管吸血的汉奴文盲，
居然能占英疣鸦片贩子和外国人的便宜？
盗魔经信徒什么都敢撒谎颠倒是非，贼喊抓贼。
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eRvKKDy6nM
http://tinyurl.com/IvyAdmission
后清学者比猪还蠢，居然加入抹黑华人的论文。
估计虚荣利欲冲心，完全无视自己被敌人利用。
因为老中学者也是作者，让文章可信度爆棚。
老中精蝇的政治智商是负值，根本想都没想到。
而黄鼠狼早已布局好，设下陷阱。抹黑母鸡狡猾。
而母鸡却图写作出名的虚荣，感激的签名加入。
后清国的脑残犯贱，在于拜敌为友，认洋贼为爹。
疣叫兽Feldman吃北大，借北大的名气抹黑后清国。
北大傻叉精蝇们也许觉还觉得沾到了剑桥的名气呢。
其实这名气就是联合北大信誉来重磅抹黑后清国。
【在 G****e 的大作中提到】
: "In regard to the Chinese inclination to treat fellow Chinese and Americans
: ethically similarly, certainly this is not true historically - field studies
: from the 1990s and early 2000s show the Chinese highly inclined to take
: advantage of westerners," Professor Feldman said. "It is an interesting
: question whether this has changed as the Chinese economy has grown and
: Chinese executives have become more experienced. Perhaps this study suggests
: they have."
|
|
