由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 九段线内土共到底是不是主张领海?
相关主题
美帝又进12海里了 U.S. Warship Sails Near Island Claimed By China WSJTG间谍船在日本海域自由航行了。
国会决议就是民意测试啊!南海要大干了
董建华发文啦:PCA是作了手脚。我土共应告PCA和那五个仲裁员Chinese navy allegedly opened fire on Filipino fishermen
中国开始推出南海国内法了2020将是美国的all time high-water mark
菲律宾也有明白人的:联合国海洋公约美帝第二次征服欧洲的利器
五角大楼明说此次行动并非针对领海的“无害通过”美国官方定义钓鱼岛的争议与敏感
听风就是雨:美国已经说了海牙决定无法执行来,地理常识
靠,索马里人也展示自己的文化、历史国际常设法院:Permanent Court of Arbitration
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: sea话题: tribunal话题: south
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
L***s
发帖数: 1148
1
刚刚在仲裁庭500页判决书中读了关键的九段线和历史权利那章,好像土共对美军飞越
航行自由的承诺也被拿来当作中国不主张九段线内是领海或内海的证据了。土共对九段
线到底是不是主张领海?
V. THE ‘NINE-DASH LINE’ AND CHINA’S CLAIM TO HISTORIC RIGHTS IN THE
MARITIME AREAS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA (SUBMISSIONS NO. 1 AND 2)
F. THE TRIBUNAL’S CONSIDERATIONS
1. The Tribunal’s Jurisdiction
(a) The Nature of China’s Claimed Rights in the South China Sea
212. At the same time, China has unequivocally stated that it respects
freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea. On 27 October
2015, China’s Vice Foreign Minister stated that “[t]he Chinese side
respects and safeguards the freedom of navigation and over-flight in the
South China Sea to which all countries are entitled under international law
. . . . There has been and will be no obstruction to navigation and over-
flight freedom in the South China Sea.” The same commitment has been
repeated in numerous other statements by Chinese officials and spokespersons.
213. Within the territorial sea, the Convention does not provide for freedom
of overflight or for freedom of navigation, beyond a right of innocent
passage. Accordingly, the Tribunal considers China’s commitment to respect
both freedom of navigation and overflight to establish that China does not
consider the sea areas within the ‘nine-dash line’ to be equivalent to its
territorial sea or internal waters. The Tribunal also notes that China
declared baselines for the territorial sea surrounding Hainan and the
Paracel Islands (see paragraph above). In the view of the Tribunal, China
would presumably not have done so if the waters both within and beyond 12
nautical miles of those islands already formed part of China’s territorial
sea (or internal waters) by virtue of a claim to historic rights through the
‘nine-dash line’.
214. In sum, on the basis of China’s conduct, the Tribunal understands that
China claims rights to the living and non-living resources within the ‘
nine-dash line’, but (apart from the territorial sea generated by any
islands) does not consider that those waters form part of its territorial
sea or internal waters.
1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
国际常设法院:Permanent Court of Arbitration菲律宾也有明白人的:联合国海洋公约
南海攻略1五角大楼明说此次行动并非针对领海的“无害通过”
轮到小白兔被指荒唐听风就是雨:美国已经说了海牙决定无法执行
越南举行史上最大阅兵式 庆祝河内建城1000年 [zz]靠,索马里人也展示自己的文化、历史
美帝又进12海里了 U.S. Warship Sails Near Island Claimed By China WSJTG间谍船在日本海域自由航行了。
国会决议就是民意测试啊!南海要大干了
董建华发文啦:PCA是作了手脚。我土共应告PCA和那五个仲裁员Chinese navy allegedly opened fire on Filipino fishermen
中国开始推出南海国内法了2020将是美国的all time high-water mark
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: sea话题: tribunal话题: south