c******a
发帖数: 4400 | 1 通篇把中国形容为thief, spies. 极尽煽动之能事。红脖看了今天就想砍两个华人。你
觉得她看你会有Any difference? 她会管你干啥的。共和民主党都讨厌中国，区别就是
民主党还讲点面子上的政治正确。她会care面子上的political correctness? 我的话
不变，支持川普的华人所有人在未来一个时刻都会后悔，早晚而已
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/11/opinions/trump-crackdown-china-tenney/index.html
By selecting Iowa Governor Terry Branstad as US Ambassador to China,
President-elect Donald Trump chose a man who Chinese President Xi Jinping
considers a "friend." But as a friend, Branstad will be the messenger to
deliver the hard truth that the days of America bowing and scraping at China
's feet are over.
To start, Trump and Branstad should put a quick end to China's economic
espionage and outright theft. And make no mistake: China is stealing from
the U.S. economy on a staggering scale.
Bill Evanina, a top deputy to Director of National Intelligence James
Clapper, estimated last year that the Chinese steal about $360 billion
annually from American companies through hacking alone. That is more than
three times the value of all US exports to China in 2015 -- and roughly
equal to the entire trade imbalance between the United States and China. In
fact, it is more than three quarters the value of US exports to all of Asia.
Add in how much intellectual property the Chinese steal the old-fashioned
way, with spies embedded in American companies, and the figure climbs by
many more billions of dollars per year. Half of the 165 private companies
surveyed by the FBI were victims of economic espionage or theft of trade
secrets. Those companies suspect that China was to blame for 95% of the
attacks. And the problem is only getting worse, with industrial spying and
sabotage up 53% in 2015 over 2014.
Then there's China's huge industry of counterfeit goods like knock-off
watches, handbags, DVDs and smartphones. That costs foreign companies, many
of them American, another $20 billion every year.
So in many ways when Trump says that China is "killing us" on trade, he's
right
Trump's rhetoric has been criticized as anti-free trade. But free-market
economists champion property rights, and conservatives and classical
liberals view protecting those rights as one of the primary purposes of
government. In this sense, Trump's promise to stop the theft is more free-
market than the approach of his do-nothing skeptics.
There's nothing virtuous about a government that is passive when foreign
entities, some linked to militaries and sovereign states, steal from private
businesses.
Of course, as the President-elect points out, when we talk about the theft
of intellectual property, we are also talking about the theft of American
jobs -- not just high-skilled jobs, like designers of the iPhone or
developers of solar technology, but also the millions of low-skilled jobs
that intellectual property supports. Indeed, intellectual property theft
deprives low-skilled workers of some of their best employment opportunities.
According to one recent study, industries that rely on intellectual property
pay low-skilled workers 40% more than industries that are not reliant on I.
P., and hire them even during economic downturns. The Department of Commerce
estimates that 45 million American workers -- almost one in three US jobs -
- rely on intellectual property protections.
Chinese intellectual property theft also robs American companies of the
incentive to innovate. For example, the last of the great American steel
manufacturers, U.S. Steel, announced in April that it had discovered Chinese
-backed hackers stole decades' worth of research on advanced steel-
production technologies and turned those discoveries over to Chinese
competitors. This raises the question: why pour millions into developing
technologies only to have the Chinese steal them and undercut your prices?
Worse yet, much more of this theft is unreported and largely unknown to the
authorities, let alone to the public, because embarrassed and victimized
companies have little recourse and only see downsides to revealing that they
were robbed by the Chinese.
The US government must act to protect American jobs, innovation and national
security against these abuses. A good start would be to send a clear signal
that there will be real consequences for any entity, state-backed or
otherwise, that steals from American companies.
In Trump's cybersecurity speech during the campaign, he outlined a plan to
deter potential aggressors with just such a signal. The United States, Trump
said, "must possess the unquestioned capacity to launch crippling counter-
attacks."
"America's dominance in this arena must be unquestioned," he continued. "
Cybersecurity is not only a question of developing defensive technologies
but offensive technologies as well."
Degrading and disrupting our attackers' offensive capabilities would show
that there's a cost to attacking American businesses.
We can respond to attacks by imposing serious consequences outside
cyberspace as well. For instance, the US Treasury and the Department of
Commerce should sanction recipients of stolen intellectual property. The
International Trade Commission is considering such sanctions in the U.S.
Steel case, but offenders should be banned from doing business with American
companies and be prohibited from importing products to America until they
can prove they have reformed.
Another smart proposal comes from the American Enterprise Institute's recent
report on cyberspace strategy, which suggests that we impose penalties when
the Chinese blackmail American companies into turning over intellectual
property.
Beijing must learn that the United States will defend American jobs and
businesses from outright theft through cyberattack and industrial espionage,
and Donald Trump appears committed to communicating that message as
president.
The damage such crime does to the US economy is real, and Trump is right to
focus on it. In a world where our second-largest trading partner is stealing
from us more than it buys from us, we must be a lot tougher than scolding
it for stepping out of line. | C****2
发帖数: 2904 | 2 说了半天，这厮的反制措施弱的可怜。
满嘴跑火车，一年被偷3600亿，就这点反制？
China
【在 c******a 的大作中提到】
: 通篇把中国形容为thief, spies. 极尽煽动之能事。红脖看了今天就想砍两个华人。你
: 觉得她看你会有Any difference? 她会管你干啥的。共和民主党都讨厌中国，区别就是
: 民主党还讲点面子上的政治正确。她会care面子上的political correctness? 我的话
: 不变，支持川普的华人所有人在未来一个时刻都会后悔，早晚而已
: http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/11/opinions/trump-crackdown-china-tenney/index.html
: By selecting Iowa Governor Terry Branstad as US Ambassador to China,
: President-elect Donald Trump chose a man who Chinese President Xi Jinping
: considers a "friend." But as a friend, Branstad will be the messenger to
: deliver the hard truth that the days of America bowing and scraping at China
: 's feet are over.
|
|
