b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 1 AngloZionist: Short primer for the newcomers
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/09/anglozionist-short-primer-for-newcomers.html
Why do I speak of "AngloZionists"? I got that question many times in the
past, so I will make a separate post about it to (hopefully) explain this
once and for all.
1) Anglo:
The USA in an Empire. With roughly 1000 overseas bases (depends on how you
count), a undeniably messianic ideology, a bigger defense offense budget
then the rest of the planet combined, 16+ spy agencies, the dollar as work
currency there is no doubt that the US is a planetary Empire. Where did the
US Empire come from? Again, that's a no brainer - from the British Empire.
Furthermore, the US Empire is really based on a select group of nations:
the Echelon countries, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and, of course
, the US. What do these countries have in common? They are the leftovers
of the British Empire and they are all English speaking. Notice that France
, Germany or Japan are not part of this elite even though they are arguably
as important or more to the USA then, say, New Zealand and far more powerful
. So the "Anglo" part is undeniable. And yet,
even though "Anglo" is an ethnic/linguistic/cultural category while "Zionist
" is a political/ideological one, very rarely do I get an objection about
speaking of "Anglos" or the "Anglosphere".
2) Zionist
Let's take the (hyper politically correct) Wikipedia definition of what the
word "Zionism" means: it is "a nationalist movement of Jews and Jewish
culture that supports the creation of a Jewish homeland in the territory
defined as the Land of Israel". Apparently, no link to the US, the Ukraine
or Timbuktu, right? But think again. Why would Jews - whether defined as a
religion or an ethnicity - need a homeland anyway? Why can't they just
live wherever they are born, just like Buddhist (a religion) or the African
Bushmen (ethnicity) who live in many different countries? The canonical
answer is that Jews have been persecuted everywhere and that therefore they
need their own homeland to serve as a safe haven in case of persecutions.
Without going into the issue of why Jews were persecuted everywhere and,
apparently, in all times, this rationale clearly implies if not the
inevitability of more persecutions or, at the very least, a high risk
thereof. Let's accept that for demonstration sake and see what this, in
turn, implies. First, that implies that Jews are inherently threatened by
non-Jews who are all at least potential anti-Semites. The threat is so
severe that a separate Gentile-free homeland must be created as the only,
best and last way to protect Jews worldwide. This, in turn, implies that
the continued existence of this homeland should become an vital and
irreplaceable priority of all Jews worldwide lest a persecution suddenly
breaks out and they have nowhere to go. Furthermore, until all Jews finally
"move up" to Israel, they better be very, very careful as all the goyim
around them could literally come down with a sudden case of genocidal anti-
Semitism at any moment. Hence all the anti-anti-Semitic organizations a la
ADL or UEJF, the Betar clubs, the network of sayanim, etc. In other words,
far from being a local "dealing with Israel only" phenomenon, Zionism is a
worldwide movement whose aim is to protect Jews from the apparently
incurable anti-Semitism of the rest of the planet. As Israel Shahak
correctly identified it, Zionism postulates that Jews should "think locally
and act globally" and when given a choice of policies always ask THE crucial
question: "But is it good for Jews?". So far from being only focused on
Israel, Zionism is really a global, planetary, ideology which unequivocally
split up all of mankind into two groups (Jews and Gentiles), which assumes
that the latter are all potential genocidal maniacs (which is racist) and
believes that saving Jewish lives is qualitatively different and more
important than saving Gentile lives (which is racist again). Anyone
doubting the ferocity of this determination should either ask a Palestinian
or study the holiday of Purim, or both. Even better, read Gilad Atzmon and
look up his definition of what is brilliantly called "pre-traumatic stress
disorder"
3) Anglo-Zionist
The British Empire and the early USA used to be pretty much wall to wall
Anglo. Sure, Jews had a strong influence (in banking for example), but
Zionism was a non-issue not only amongst non-Jews, but also amongst US Jews.
Besides, religious Jews were often very hostile to the notion of a secular
Israel while secular Jews did not really care about this quasi Biblical
notion. WWII definitely gave a massive boost to the Zionist movement while,
as Norman Finkelstein explained it, the topic of the "Holocaust" became
central to Jewish discourse and identity only many years later. I won't go
into the history of the rise to power of Jews in the USA, but from roughly
Ford to GW Bush's Neocons it has been steady. And even though Obama
initially pushed them out, they came right back in through the backdoor.
Right now, the only question is whether US Jews have more power than US
Anglos or the other way around. Before going any further, let me also
immediately say that I am not talking about Jews or Anglos as a group, but I
am referring to the top 1% within each of these groups. Furthermore, I don
't believe that the top 1% of Jews cares any more about Israel or the 99% of
Jews than the top 1% of Anglos care about the USA or the Anglo people. So,
here my thesis:
The US Empire is run by a 1% (or less) elite which can be called the "deep
state" which is composed of two main groups: Anglos and Jews. These two
groups are in many ways hostile to each other (just like the SS and SA or
Trotskysts and Stalinists), but they share 1) a racist outlook on the rest
of mankind 2) a messianic ideology 3) a phenomenal propensity for violence 4
) an obsession with money and greed and its power to corrupt. So they work
together almost all the time.
Now this might seem basic, but so many people miss it, that I will have to
explicitly state it: to say that most US elites are Anglos or Jews does not
mean that most Anglos or Jews are part of the US elites. That is a straw-
man argument which deliberately ignores the non commutative property of my
thesis to turn it into a racist statement which accuses most/all Anglos or
Jews of some evil doing. So to be very clear:
When I speak of AngloZionist Empire I am referring to the predominant
ideology of the 1%ers elites which for this Empire's "deep state".
By the way, there are non-Jewish Zionists (Biden, in his own words) and
there are (plenty of) anti-Zionist Jews. Likewise, there are non-Anglo
imperialists and there are (plenty of) anti-imperialists Anglos. To speak
of "Nazi Germany" or "Soviet Russia" does in now way imply that all Germans
were Nazis or all Russian s Communists. All this means it that the
predominant ideology of these nations at that specific moment in time was
National-Socialism and Marxism, that's all. | t*******y
发帖数: 374 | 2 Very thoughtful and deep observation but hardly mass news media dare to
challenge even to mention it. People here in mitbbs seem just to ignore it.
you
the
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
: AngloZionist: Short primer for the newcomers
: http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/09/anglozionist-short-primer-for-newcomers.html
: Why do I speak of "AngloZionists"? I got that question many times in the
: past, so I will make a separate post about it to (hopefully) explain this
: once and for all.
: 1) Anglo:
: The USA in an Empire. With roughly 1000 overseas bases (depends on how you
: count), a undeniably messianic ideology, a bigger defense offense budget
: then the rest of the planet combined, 16+ spy agencies, the dollar as work
: currency there is no doubt that the US is a planetary Empire. Where did the
|
|
