boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 中国生物医学大跃进,米国烂死
相关主题
加州华裔家暴血案!妻子枪杀丈夫后自杀
Infrared Gadgets to Detect and Blind An Incoming Missile
空中力量澳大利亚 文章: 中国新型J20隐形战机对F35和F/A-18意味着什么.
日本正式宣布内胆(压力壳)没有破掉
日本飞机发干扰蛋的照片出来了
天朝警告trump:再闹就要脱手套了
操,美国海军撞船不是没有原因的,看看95年美国加拿大海军对话,哈哈
第一件是联合国公开威胁恐吓别的国家
中国海关称已对部分自美国进口的商品实施加征关税
polygraph
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: chinese话题: data话题: gene话题: dai
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****e
发帖数: 25
1
HONG KONG -- At 28, Dai Wenyuan quit his job developing artificial
intelligence software for Chinese internet giant Baidu to launch his own
company. It was a smart move: his AI start-up quickly attracted an initial $
4 million investment from Sequoia Capital China in 2015.
Three years later, Dai's company is capturing attention for developing a
medical tool that uses AI to predict whether patients are at risk of
developing diabetes. His company, 4Paradigm, said its accuracy rate was 88%.
Key to that success is access to reams of patient data. 4Paradigm's AI
software scanned medical information -- including gender, blood sugar levels
and weight -- collected from 170,000 patients by researchers at Shanghai's
Ruijin Hospital. From there, it used machine learning to predict which
patients were most at risk of developing the disease.
Dai says that as the company refines its methodology, the techniques can be
applied to other diseases -- from heart disease to hyperlipidemia and kidney
disease.
"Our mission is AI for everyone," Dai said.
Dai is among the scores of engineers and computer scientists who are
combining IT and big data to identify people at risk of developing diseases,
then using that information to make early diagnoses and plan the best
treatment.
The field is booming in China, in large part because researchers have access
to patient data that would be off-limits in other countries.
"China has a very good chance to lead the world in biotech because of the
data," Dai said. "A lot of foreign scientists want to apply to work in China
because of the [availability of] data."
Beijing has identified the pharma and biotech sectors as two main pillars of
future growth as China shifts away from the export-led manufacturing that
has left its skies yellow and its waterways polluted. Now, some in the U.S.
worry that China could soon eclipse it in key areas such as predictive
medicine, gene editing and stem cell research.
"A lot of foreign scientists want to apply to work in China because of the [
availability of] data"
Dai Wenyuan, founder of 4Paradigm
China has some distinct advantages. Scientists on both sides of the Pacific
believe early detection and treatment for diseases such as cancer will come
from applying AI and machine learning to the personal health data of large
numbers of people -- and no country on earth has more such data with fewer
constraints on access to it than China.
"The bottom line is whoever has the largest, most diverse data sets of
different populations wins the day," Edward You, a special agent in the FBI'
s Biological Countermeasures Unit, told a congressional hearing in
Washington last year. That committee was looking into the potential threat
that Chinese biotech could pose to the U.S.
To accelerate growth in the sector, China introduced a swifter regulatory
system in 2017 that expedites approvals for innovative drugs. Pharmaceutical
companies are encouraged to focus on high-priority diseases and then
manufacture the treatments locally.
Many scientists believe the next generation of medical breakthroughs will
come from what Kenneth Oye, director of the Program on Emerging Technologies
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, refers to as the blurring of
the lines between information technology, biotechnology and "the great
conjunction of DNA sequencing, data, pattern recognition and gene editing."
This big idea has translated into an investment boom. Last year, biotech
startups in China, broadly defined, raised almost $30 billion, according to
data from McKinsey. And while venture inflows in other Chinese tech sectors
have slowed, $32 billion was raised in the first half of this year,
suggesting that 2018 will break last year's record, Beijing-based merchant
bank China Renaissance calculates. International private equity firms such
as General Atlantic and Warburg Pincus have also become big investors in the
sector.
Building a U.S.-style model
There is also a darker side to Chinese life sciences, however. China doesn't
have the same level of concern about personal privacy as the U.S., and
there are far fewer constraints on human trials. Moreover, the scandal now
raging on social media in China over unsafe vaccines is merely the latest in
a series of such scandals involving tainted medicines and contaminated
foodstuffs.
Of even greater concern is the fact that leading-edge research in China in
gene editing has the potential for malign purposes. One of the great hopes
for gene editing is that it will allow doctors to tweak the DNA of so-called
bad gene babies to prevent susceptibility to disease and congenital
handicaps. But what is the definition of a "bad gene" baby? And who gets to
decide?
Those questions were thrust into the limelight in April 2015, when a team of
researchers in China announced they had used a cutting-edge gene editing
technique known as CRISPR/CAS-9 to alter the DNA of human embryos. Though
the experiment itself was a failure, scientists in the West were swift to
condemn the attempt on ethical grounds. The National Institutes of Health in
the U.S. responded with a statement that said: "The concept of altering the
human germline in embryos for clinical purposes ... has been viewed almost
universally as a line that should not be crossed."
A researcher performs a CRISPR/Cas9 process. Hopes are high that this gene-
editing technique will unlock cures for a range of ailments. 漏 AP
At least nine gene editing studies for various forms of cancer are underway
in China, including for lung, bladder, cervix and prostate, some of which
are using human patients. Meanwhile, there are four gene editing cancer
studies active in the U.S., two of which are seeking human participants,
according to clinicaltrials.gov, a site run by the U.S. National Library of
Medicine.
Mainland researchers who have studied and worked in the U.S. have helped
China build an ecosystem modeled on the American template, with the same
sort of close relations between government, academia and private companies.
Funding is also plentiful from public pockets, but that government money
doesn't come only from Beijing. It also comes from local governments eager
to see their region make the transition from polluting activities such as
mining and manufacturing to more environmentally friendly, higher value
added activities.
Shanghai and Beijing each have earmarked 10 billion yuan to help young
ventures. Others such as Suzhou in Jiangsu Province are creating life
science parks. A third group, including wealthy Shenzhen, offers to match
private capital funding on a 1-to-1 basis and subsidizes patents to attract
biotech companies to the city. Policy banks also support the sector through
funds such as China Development Bank's Kai Yuan Capital, with $10 billion
under management. And then there are tax breaks and other incentives.
Moreover, the Chinese regulatory agencies have been slowly transformed in
the last decade, after the then head of the Chinese equivalent of the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration, Zheng Xiaoyu, was executed for corruption.
When its most recent head Bi Jingquan took over, he let it be known that if
his inspectors detected fraud in applications for drugs or trials, he would
enforce a five-year ban for applications from offenders, thereby reducing
the queue by 80%, says Wang Xiaodong, co-founder of biotech company BeiGene.
Officials from China's Food and Drug Administration check rabies vaccines in
Huaibei. The head of the organization was forced to resign in August amid a
substandard-vaccine scandal. 漏 AFP/Jiji
Bi was recently forced to resign over the vaccine scandal in the face of
widespread criticism in China -- underscoring the challenges that remain in
regulating China's drug industry.
Two-way traffic
Much of China's success in life sciences is thanks to close ties with U.S.
drug groups. Cross-border research and development deals that involve
Chinese biotechnology companies have increased by 70% since 2012. Licensing
is one of the most critical areas of cross-Pacific cooperation.
In the past, that traffic was just one way, with companies like Pfizer or
Celgene licensing drugs to Chinese drug companies such as Fosun Pharma.
Indeed, in the past year China was the recipient of drugs in 27 cases. But
increasingly, mainland companies such as Wuxi Biologics are licensing their
products to U.S. players, data from McKinsey shows.
Few companies better symbolize the close relations between the U.S. and
China when it comes to science than BeiGene. The biotech company, which is
developing innovative cancer treatments, is headquartered in Beijing with
listings in Hong Kong and on the Nasdaq in New York. It imports technology
from the U.S., but also licenses its technology to companies in America,
demonstrating that intellectual property in the exploding field of biotech
now travels in both directions.
WuXi Biologics -- whose parent company is Shanghai-based WuXi AppTec --
announced in April that it will invest $393 million to build a manufacturing
facility in Ireland. 漏 AP
But there are signs that Washington is now trying to sever such ties.
In August, the Trump administration signed into law a harsh new investment
regime under the Committee for Foreign Investment in the U.S., or CFIUS,
that seeks to guard emerging technologies -- including genetic information -
- on national security grounds.
The overriding aim of the "new" CFIUS is to reverse this collaborative trend
with China. The result is likely to be a chilling of the relationship, and
at least a partial freeze on both the capital flows and human capital
movements that contributed so much to recent progress.
Such actions reflect the acknowledgment that data is what defines
competitive advantage today, giving China increasing influence across many
different technologies -- none more critical than in life sciences.
BeiGene is just one player at the frontier of life sciences with one foot in
China and the other in the U.S. Most American pharmaceutical companies,
such as Eli Lilly, have venture arms in China that provide both funding and
scientists to young mainland startups.
BeiGene's two co-founders are John Oyler, an American, and Wang Xiaodong, a
native of Beijing. Wang was one of the earliest beneficiaries of the China-U
.S. Biochemistry Examination and Application program that brought hundreds
of Chinese Ph.D. students to the U.S. in the 1980s. Today, in addition to
his role at BeiGene, he is director general of a government-backed life
science center in Beijing.
Such happy stories may now be coming to an end in the face of fears that are
partly about competition and partly about legitimate concerns over how data
is obtained and used in China. Indeed, the cross-pollination between the U.
S. and China -- including flows of both human and financial capital -- that
has improved early detection and treatment of disease is increasingly at
risk.
Collaborations used to be considered a good thing. Now they are being
scrutinized and questioned as part of broader U.S. soul-searching about
whether the country is losing its technological edge to and its national
security is being impaired by an ascendant China.
"In life sciences we are catching up. ... Our data is better. The
technological gap with the U.S. is disappearing"
Chinese entrepreneur Han Yusheng
"If China does prove to be successful, outcompeting America in a high
technology sector like biotechnology, it would represent another way in
which many of the key assumptions that have guided globalization forward in
its modern era have been proved to be either inadequate or simply rhetoric,"
said Ben Shobert, founder of Rubicon Strategy and a senior associate for
international health at the National Bureau of Asian Research, in his
testimony before the U.S. Congress.
Yet even while scientists, policymakers and politicians in the U.S. debate
the scale of the competitive thrust of young Chinese companies and the
potential for malign use of their innovations, many of those who are the
object of that concern believe the outcome of any contest is already clear.
Han Yusheng, a Chinese entrepreneur with a background in biology, is one of
them. Han founded Burning Rock in 2014 to promote the early diagnosis and
treatment of cancer, especially lung cancer, using next-generation gene
sequencing-based cancer diagnostics. For him, it is clear the lead the U.S.
has enjoyed over China in biotech is quickly eroding.
"In life sciences we are catching up," Han said. "Our data is better. The
technological gap with the U.S. is disappearing."
C**A
发帖数: 535
2
Key to that success is access to reams of patient data. 4Paradigm's AI
software scanned medical information -- including gender, blood sugar levels
and weight -- collected from 170,000 patients by researchers at Shanghai's
Ruijin Hospital. From there, it used machine learning to predict which
patients were most at risk of developing the disease.
就这种Topic,一块钱可以听八段。好点的护理学院博士做这个都没法毕业。
1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
polygraph
中国政府放话 会反击美国9月的关税
本次流行美国有预演而且有应对办法:Event 201- Oct 18th, 2019 (转载)
Charles River16亿美元收购无锡 PHARMA
中资在美购矿遭拒折射白宫虚伪
美国政府阻止中资入股美国光纤制造商
美国政府阻止中资入股美国光纤制造商
华为为何一再败走美国?
美国会议员:鞍钢在美投资威胁国家安全
从NED 拿钱的和拿奖学金的本质是一样的。
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: chinese话题: data话题: gene话题: dai