P****R 发帖数: 22479 | | P****R 发帖数: 22479 | 2 那个所谓偷菌种的中国人是胡吹。
完全可以从那位犹太人那里获得标准纯菌种。
而所谓从苏联偷菌种更是无稽之谈。
这位犹太人是美籍俄裔犹太人,肯定无偿送给苏联人纯菌株 | p**********r 发帖数: 925 | 3 你是二百五么?
病毒拿来直接用呢?
人家是病毒拿来做出来疫苗!
减毒毒株 != 疫苗 | M*****8 发帖数: 17722 | 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-196JGikptQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGDiYofpwvI
As pointed out by Robert Cook-Deegan at Duke University,
“When Jonas Salk asked rhetorically “Would you patent the
sun?” during his famous television interview with Edward
R. Murrow, he did not mention that the lawyers from the
National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis had looked
into patenting the Salk Vaccine and concluded that it
could not be patented because of prior art – that it
would not be considered a patentable invention by
standards of the day.
Salk implied that the decision was a moral one, but
Jane Smith, in her history of the Salk Vaccine,
Patenting the Sun, notes that whether or not Salk
himself believed what he said to Murrow, the idea of
patenting the vaccine had been directly analyzed and
the decision was made not to apply for a patent mainly
because it would not result in one.
We will never know whether the National Foundation
on Infantile Paralysis or the University of Pittsburgh
would have patented the vaccine if they could, but the
simple moral interpretation often applied to this case
is simply wrong.”
http://www.biotech-now.org/public-policy/patently-biotech/2012/01/the-real-reason-why-salk-refused-to-patent-the-polio-vaccine-a-myth-in-the-making
【在 P****R 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2966991-1050683.html
| b****a 发帖数: 4465 | 5 他不是250,他是存心使坏
尼克松1971年才解除杜鲁门对中国的禁运
【在 p**********r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 你是二百五么? : 病毒拿来直接用呢? : 人家是病毒拿来做出来疫苗! : 减毒毒株 != 疫苗
|
|