g**********1
发帖数: 1 | 1 当头一棒，哈哈。
A federal judge has temporarily blocked part of President Trump’s plan to
build a wall along the southern border with money Congress never
appropriated for that purpose.
U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., of the Northern District of
California, said that those challenging Trump’s actions had a good chance
of prevailing on their claims that the administration is acting illegally in
shifting money from other programs to pay for the wall.
Gilliam wrote that the government’s position “that when Congress declines
the Executive’s request to appropriate funds, the Executive may simply find
a way to spend those funds ‘without Congress’ does not square with
fundamental separation of powers principles dating back to the earliest days
of our Republic.”
The law the administration invoked to shift funds allows transfers for “
unforeseen” events. Gilliam said the government’s claim that wall
construction was “unforeseen” “cannot logically be squared” with Trump’
s many demands for funding dating back to early 2018 and even in the
campaign.
With some contracts already awarded for construction, Gilliam said that
allowing work to go forward before the legal issues have been fully resolved
could cause irreparable harm. |
Y***i
发帖数: 1932 | |
g******t
发帖数: 18158 | |
j****z
发帖数: 299 | 4 巨巨上台都两年多了吧，说好的墨西哥出钱修墙的，这要是偷军费来修墙不是证明没能
力么，法官也是爱护他，不让他失信于民不是 lol |
Y***i
发帖数: 1932 | |
n********d
发帖数: 7676 | 6 胜也爱你，败也爱你，没有你世界会毁灭，没有你就没有我们。-川粉 |
v****s
发帖数: 40 | 7 老将们集体去边境堆成一堵墙正好，省了米粒贱末代大统领出钱，还为米粒贱奉献了一
切，米粒贱万税! |
h**********e
发帖数: 2973 | 8 这个结果并不奇怪，其实还比原来预计要好，因为法官只是部分的block了Trump的
order.
这个案子无论区域法官怎么判，都得往上走，如果第九巡回庭的判决仍然对政府不利，
这个案子必定要上最高法院。
in
declines
find
【在 g**********1 的大作中提到】
: 当头一棒，哈哈。
: A federal judge has temporarily blocked part of President Trump’s plan to
: build a wall along the southern border with money Congress never
: appropriated for that purpose.
: U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., of the Northern District of
: California, said that those challenging Trump’s actions had a good chance
: of prevailing on their claims that the administration is acting illegally in
: shifting money from other programs to pay for the wall.
: Gilliam wrote that the government’s position “that when Congress declines
: the Executive’s request to appropriate funds, the Executive may simply find
|
