d********a 发帖数: 9567 | |
S**********p 发帖数: 331 | 2 “While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 with
high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is not
ideal7 and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS-CoV
to be optimal for receptor binding7,11. Thus, the high-affinity binding of
the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of
natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal
binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not
the product of purposeful manipulation."
这逻辑,连GRE都过不了 |
m********1 发帖数: 1 | 3 小将埋怨native speakers的英语不好?哈哈哈哈
: “While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2
with
: high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is
not
: ideal7 and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS
-CoV
: to be optimal for receptor binding7,11. Thus, the high-affinity
binding of
: the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result
of
: natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another
optimal
: binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is
not
: the product of purposeful manipulation."
: 这逻辑,连GRE都过不了
【在 S**********p 的大作中提到】 : “While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 with : high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is not : ideal7 and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS-CoV : to be optimal for receptor binding7,11. Thus, the high-affinity binding of : the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of : natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal : binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not : the product of purposeful manipulation." : 这逻辑,连GRE都过不了
|
l*******4 发帖数: 1 | |
k**i 发帖数: 10191 | 5 你丫没看懂吧。文章说SARS-CoV-2和ACE2结合性虽然很高,但并非最优化,因此是自然
优化结果,病毒有进一步优化空间,而不是实验室产物。
with
optimal
【在 S**********p 的大作中提到】 : “While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 with : high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is not : ideal7 and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS-CoV : to be optimal for receptor binding7,11. Thus, the high-affinity binding of : the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of : natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal : binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not : the product of purposeful manipulation." : 这逻辑,连GRE都过不了
|
D*T 发帖数: 571 | 6 他是这个论坛最傻逼的贱人
ACE2
is
SARS
【在 m********1 的大作中提到】 : 小将埋怨native speakers的英语不好?哈哈哈哈 : : : “While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 : with : : high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is : not : : ideal7 and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS : -CoV : : to be optimal for receptor binding7,11. Thus, the high-affinity : binding of
|
n********g 发帖数: 6504 | 7 对生物的要求不能太高
with
optimal
【在 S**********p 的大作中提到】 : “While the analyses above suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 with : high affinity, computational analyses predict that the interaction is not : ideal7 and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS-CoV : to be optimal for receptor binding7,11. Thus, the high-affinity binding of : the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of : natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal : binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not : the product of purposeful manipulation." : 这逻辑,连GRE都过不了
|
S**********p 发帖数: 331 | 8 人工优化就一定要优化到最优化?不能故意选个次优?
你拉低了菌斑GRE逻辑的分数线啊。
【在 k**i 的大作中提到】 : 你丫没看懂吧。文章说SARS-CoV-2和ACE2结合性虽然很高,但并非最优化,因此是自然 : 优化结果,病毒有进一步优化空间,而不是实验室产物。 : : with : optimal
|
|
S**********p 发帖数: 331 | 9 我们千老水平还是可以的。写这个文章的明显是访学。
【在 n********g 的大作中提到】 : 对生物的要求不能太高 : : with : optimal
|
n********g 发帖数: 6504 | 10 审稿的和责任编辑呢?
【在 S**********p 的大作中提到】 : 我们千老水平还是可以的。写这个文章的明显是访学。
|
S**********p 发帖数: 331 | 11 当编辑的都是千老转码工失败的。
【在 n********g 的大作中提到】 : 审稿的和责任编辑呢?
|