|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s*****n
发帖数: 1998 | 1 西方媒体采访西方的专业人士， 一般都是对我鳖赞赏有加， 问到我鳖隐瞒的问题一般
都能如实回答。
西方的政客， 毫无做人的底线， 政治出发满嘴胡言：
一会儿说中国隐瞒疫情， 西方专业人士知道中国科研人员十二月就开始发文章了， 哪
来的隐瞒？
一会儿说中国应该控制疫情， 韩国控制了么？ 意大利控制了么？ 英国控制了么？ 西
班牙控制了么？ 德国控制了么？ 美国控制了么？ 凭什么要第一个爆发的中国控制？
太瞧得起中国的能力了吧
还有怀疑中国虚报数据， 同理， 美国华人为什么得病这么少？ 是不是虚报数据了？
意大利的华人聚居区， 一个得病的都没有， 显然是更虚报数据了。中国应该质问为什
么美国政府要虚报美国华人的感染数据。 | V********u
发帖数: 80 | | b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 3 Something I don’t understand right now is why the media is intentionally
pitting Trump against Dr. Fauci. Over and over again they’ve put Fauci in
an impossible position where he has to bend himself into a pretzel in order
to tell the truth about the virus but also not piss Trump off so he doesn’t
get fired. We all know how Trump works at this point. He doesn’t want to
be upstaged and he doesn’t want to be contradicted.
I’m not saying we should have to play his game, but quite tragically that
is the way things are right now. A journalist got Fauci to say Trump could
have saved thousands of lives if he had acted earlier, and now quite
predictably Fauci’s head is on the chopping block. Do we really want that
man to be fired right now, the only adult in the room coming out in those
briefings actually telling the cold hard facts about the virus? Does anyone
really believe that Fauci’s firing would actually change any of Trump
supporters minds about the monster? No. He’ll just be replaced by someone
who does a better job at towing the company line. Or he won’t be replaced
at all and Trump will just talk more.
Journalism has a duty to tell the truth particularly when we have an
administration lead by a pathological liar. But there has to be some tact in
how it goes about that. This tactic
that values a gotcha moment over as important of a human resource as Fauci
has been just doesn’t make much sense to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
