f******r
发帖数: 1 | 1 凡是跟制裁的官员有交易的，都要被制裁，难不成土共的那些官员全用现金？还是干脆
就废掉美元结算，另起炉灶？asset freeze估计大银行都受不了吧
Following the submission of the State Department report, the HKAA would
further require the U.S. Treasury Department, in consultation with the U.S.
State Department, to submit a report to Congress identifying any foreign
financial institutions that “knowingly conduct[ed] a significant
transaction” with any individuals and entities identified in the State
Department report. The Treasury Department report would be updated in a
similar manner to the State Department report.
The HKAA defines “knowingly” so as to impose an “actual knowledge”
standard for a foreign financial institution’s conduct in connection with
foreign individuals or entities identified in the State Department’s report
. The term “significant transaction” is not expressly defined in the HKAA,
but presumably would be subject to the same multi-factor test that the
Office of Foreign Assets Control uses under the Countering America’s
Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (“CAATSA”).
Within one year of a foreign financial institution’s inclusion in the
report, the President would be required to impose not fewer than five of the
sanctions in a menu of 10 possible restrictions. Within two years of a
foreign financial institution’s inclusion in the Treasury Department’s
report, the President would be required to impose all 10 of the restrictions
provided in the menu of sanctions. The menu includes:
Prohibition on U.S. banks from lending to the institution;
Prohibition on the institution’s designation by the Federal Reserve as a
primary dealer in U.S. treasuries;
Prohibition on exports, re-exports or in-country transfers of U.S.
commodities, software or technology to the institution;
Prohibition on U.S. banks from providing a USD correspondent account to the
institution; and
Blocking sanctions (asset freezes) on the institution. |
|
