b***a 发帖数: 6422 | 1 是否包括INTERNET(TIME WARNER)和手机账单(TMOBILE)。
谢谢! |
f********i 发帖数: 8412 | |
b***a 发帖数: 6422 | 3 wonderful.因为我好像只看到CABLE TV,但没看到CABLE INTERNET。
最可惜的是我用的NATIONAL GRID只能用CHECKING ACCOUNT付账单,好几百啊,真恶心!
【在 f********i 的大作中提到】 : y
|
s***e 发帖数: 7166 | 4 national grid可以用信用卡付账单,不过要交手续费。
心!
【在 b***a 的大作中提到】 : wonderful.因为我好像只看到CABLE TV,但没看到CABLE INTERNET。 : 最可惜的是我用的NATIONAL GRID只能用CHECKING ACCOUNT付账单,好几百啊,真恶心!
|
b***a 发帖数: 6422 | 5 那个好像很麻烦吧?还要通过西联汇款啥的。
【在 s***e 的大作中提到】 : national grid可以用信用卡付账单,不过要交手续费。 : : 心!
|
y****i 发帖数: 17878 | 6 pay with Discover, free
http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/finance/1120377/
【在 b***a 的大作中提到】 : 那个好像很麻烦吧?还要通过西联汇款啥的。
|
b***a 发帖数: 6422 | 7 到底能有多少CASH BACK? 0.25%?
【在 y****i 的大作中提到】 : pay with Discover, free : http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/finance/1120377/
|
b***a 发帖数: 6422 | 8 大概看了一下,感觉意思不大。
似乎还不太可靠,我是说付款的方式。
这些该死的电气公司为啥不能正常收CC PAYMENT呢?
【在 y****i 的大作中提到】 : pay with Discover, free : http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/finance/1120377/
|
y****i 发帖数: 17878 | 9 better than nothing
【在 b***a 的大作中提到】 : 到底能有多少CASH BACK? 0.25%?
|
y****i 发帖数: 17878 | 10 have been using it since 9/2011 for convenience, so far so good.
【在 b***a 的大作中提到】 : 大概看了一下,感觉意思不大。 : 似乎还不太可靠,我是说付款的方式。 : 这些该死的电气公司为啥不能正常收CC PAYMENT呢?
|
|
|
s**********g 发帖数: 14942 | 11 为啥要收cc payment
连verizon都要开始对one-time cc payment开征手续费了
可见这些公司对于小额的cc交易引入的手续费开始头疼了
【在 b***a 的大作中提到】 : 大概看了一下,感觉意思不大。 : 似乎还不太可靠,我是说付款的方式。 : 这些该死的电气公司为啥不能正常收CC PAYMENT呢?
|
y****i 发帖数: 17878 | 12 Verizon gave it up just 1 day after the announcement
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/verizon-reverses-2-fee-one-202956
it should not have been a PR disaster if they just charge a small percentage
of the payment as convenience fee rather than $2 for each payment.
【在 s**********g 的大作中提到】 : 为啥要收cc payment : 连verizon都要开始对one-time cc payment开征手续费了 : 可见这些公司对于小额的cc交易引入的手续费开始头疼了
|
s**********g 发帖数: 14942 | 13 但至少这表明了为啥电力公司都不喜欢cc-payment
电力公司反正大家都得用电交钱。。而且既然各家公司都不接受cc-payment 就不怕了
percentage
【在 y****i 的大作中提到】 : Verizon gave it up just 1 day after the announcement : http://finance.yahoo.com/news/verizon-reverses-2-fee-one-202956 : it should not have been a PR disaster if they just charge a small percentage : of the payment as convenience fee rather than $2 for each payment.
|
y****i 发帖数: 17878 | 14 right, the answer boils down to one word - competition
http://www.cardratings.com/creditcardblog/2011/09/should-you-pa
Why some utilities don't take credit cards
I asked Brinkman why that is, why utility companies haven't been as quick to
accept credit card payments. He says it's due to the interchange fee that
credit cards charge for processing payments. Retailers accept them as a cost
of doing business, says Brinkman. He's right, of course. If you're selling
something in a store, and you don't accept credit cards, you're going to
have 500 competitors that do accept them.
"But with utilities," Brinkman says, "they don't need to accept credit cards
for competitive reasons, and that's where we can step in. The extra fee is
worth it to the customer but not worth it to the utility."
You can agree or disagree with that, but not on his next point. Adds
Brinkman: "The utilities will get their money, or they'll turn your service
off."
【在 s**********g 的大作中提到】 : 但至少这表明了为啥电力公司都不喜欢cc-payment : 电力公司反正大家都得用电交钱。。而且既然各家公司都不接受cc-payment 就不怕了 : : percentage
|
b***a 发帖数: 6422 | 15 真够无耻的。
to
cost
selling
cards
【在 y****i 的大作中提到】 : right, the answer boils down to one word - competition : http://www.cardratings.com/creditcardblog/2011/09/should-you-pa : Why some utilities don't take credit cards : I asked Brinkman why that is, why utility companies haven't been as quick to : accept credit card payments. He says it's due to the interchange fee that : credit cards charge for processing payments. Retailers accept them as a cost : of doing business, says Brinkman. He's right, of course. If you're selling : something in a store, and you don't accept credit cards, you're going to : have 500 competitors that do accept them. : "But with utilities," Brinkman says, "they don't need to accept credit cards
|