g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | |
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 2 IEEE? Normal impact factor of IEEE trans is about 1.5? u cannot compare
engineer with science in journal. |
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 3 kao, 1.5 is way too low a... looks like engineering and science are indeed
different.
is this one like Science or Natural or Journal of Finance?
or lower than that.
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: IEEE? Normal impact factor of IEEE trans is about 1.5? u cannot compare
: engineer with science in journal.
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 4 U can treat it as an extension of conference paper. Most conference paper
has page limitation. But IEEE transaction allows about 14 pages(2 col, 10
fonts). I guess thats' enough to fit in. People in china thinks
transaction is very important. But most content is out of date due to long
review processing. If you look for some new ideas and recent work, just
walk through top conferences.
Now papers are absolutely not chinese APs' weakness. Most of them have
plenty of transactions and even top conference papers( I heard Dr chen
yaojin has 5 pages of publications in his C.V.) . But it's still tough to
get attention of funding agencies. It's not that easy to enter into their
circles. |
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 5 so transaction is like a conference paper?
I used to publish one conference paper in a international conference when I
was in college. Does that count as publication in C.V? I thought only stuff
published in Journal considered publication.
paper
10
to
their
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: U can treat it as an extension of conference paper. Most conference paper
: has page limitation. But IEEE transaction allows about 14 pages(2 col, 10
: fonts). I guess thats' enough to fit in. People in china thinks
: transaction is very important. But most content is out of date due to long
: review processing. If you look for some new ideas and recent work, just
: walk through top conferences.
: Now papers are absolutely not chinese APs' weakness. Most of them have
: plenty of transactions and even top conference papers( I heard Dr chen
: yaojin has 5 pages of publications in his C.V.) . But it's still tough to
: get attention of funding agencies. It's not that easy to enter into their
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 6 U just wrote it. I will not report it to fang zhouzi! take it easy
I
stuff
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: so transaction is like a conference paper?
: I used to publish one conference paper in a international conference when I
: was in college. Does that count as publication in C.V? I thought only stuff
: published in Journal considered publication.
:
: paper
: 10
: to
: their
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 7 I thought nature/science is more like a magazine like ESPN about academic
8g. |
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 8 report what?
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: U just wrote it. I will not report it to fang zhouzi! take it easy
:
: I
: stuff
|
H****u
发帖数: 129 | 9 two different fields
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: kao, 1.5 is way too low a... looks like engineering and science are indeed
: different.
: is this one like Science or Natural or Journal of Finance?
: or lower than that.
|
H****u
发帖数: 129 | 10 top conference papers better than journal? if not cs major, name a few
paper
10
to
their
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: U can treat it as an extension of conference paper. Most conference paper
: has page limitation. But IEEE transaction allows about 14 pages(2 col, 10
: fonts). I guess thats' enough to fit in. People in china thinks
: transaction is very important. But most content is out of date due to long
: review processing. If you look for some new ideas and recent work, just
: walk through top conferences.
: Now papers are absolutely not chinese APs' weakness. Most of them have
: plenty of transactions and even top conference papers( I heard Dr chen
: yaojin has 5 pages of publications in his C.V.) . But it's still tough to
: get attention of funding agencies. It's not that easy to enter into their
|
|
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 11 LOL, My bullshit is used to fool goldstonetd. don't take it seriously.
【在 H****u 的大作中提到】
: top conference papers better than journal? if not cs major, name a few
:
: paper
: 10
: to
: their
|
s******3
发帖数: 7297 | 12 在EE领域1.5不错了 2.0以上就算很高了 不同专业差很多的 |
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 13 nnd, what is real truth.
what is Transaction then.
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: LOL, My bullshit is used to fool goldstonetd. don't take it seriously.
|
m********t
发帖数: 9426 | 14 usually IEEE Transactoins are good journals in all EE fields, in my field,
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, IEEE
Transactions on Reliability...are deemed to top journals.
not as good as Science, Nature, PNAS though, for sure.
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: nnd, what is real truth.
: what is Transaction then.
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 15 Another EE guy. not surprised. |
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 16 i get it. so it is good journal. not some conference paper like zhuxiaoK
claimed to be.
【在 m********t 的大作中提到】
: usually IEEE Transactoins are good journals in all EE fields, in my field,
: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, IEEE
: Transactions on Reliability...are deemed to top journals.
: not as good as Science, Nature, PNAS though, for sure.
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 17 LOL
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: i get it. so it is good journal. not some conference paper like zhuxiaoK
: claimed to be.
|
